Real-Time Kinematic, Temporospatial, and Kinetic Biofeedback During Gait Retraining in Patients: A Systematic Review

被引:101
作者
Tate, Jeremiah J. [1 ]
Milner, Clare E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Exercise Sport & Leisure Studies, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2010年 / 90卷 / 08期
关键词
ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC BIOFEEDBACK; FOOT-DROP; FEEDBACK; STROKE; REHABILITATION; ARTHROPLASTY; HIP;
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20080281
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Biofeedback has been used in rehabilitation settings for gait retraining. Purpose. The purpose of this review was to summarize and synthesize the findings of studies involving real-time kinematic, temporospatial, and kinetic biofeedback. The goal was to provide a general overview of the effectiveness of these forms of biofeedback in treating gait abnormalities. Data Sources. Articles were identified through searches of the following data-bases: MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials. All searches were limited to the English language and encompassed the period from 1965 to November 2007. Study Selection. Titles and abstracts were screened to identify studies that met the following requirements: the study included the use of kinematic, temporospatial, or kinetic biofeedback during gait training, and the population of interest showed abnormal movement patterns as a result of a pathology or injury. Data Extraction. All articles that met the inclusion criteria were assessed by use of the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies. Data Synthesis. Seven articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Effect sizes were calculated for the primary outcome variables for all studies that provided enough data. Effect sizes generally suggested moderate to large treatment effects for all methods of biofeedback during practice. Limitations. Several of the studies lacked adequate randomization; therefore, readers should exercise caution when interpreting authors' conclusions. Conclusions. Each biofeedback method appeared to result in moderate to large treatment effects immediately after treatment. However, it is unknown whether the effects were maintained. Future studies should ensure adequate randomization of participants and implementation of motor learning concepts and should include retention testing to assess the long-term success of biofeedback and outcome measures capable of demonstrating coordinative changes in gait and improvement in function.
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1134
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Base of support feedback in gait rehabilitation
    Aruin, AS
    Hanke, TA
    Sharma, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2003, 26 (04) : 309 - 312
  • [2] Basmajian J.V., 1989, BIOFEEDBACK PRINCIPL, P1
  • [3] BASMAJIAN JV, 1975, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V56, P231
  • [4] EVALUATION OF ELECTRO-MYOGRAPHIC BIOFEEDBACK AS AN ADJUNCT TO THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE IN TREATING THE LOWER-EXTREMITIES OF HEMIPLEGIC PATIENTS
    BINDER, SA
    MOLL, CB
    WOLF, SL
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1981, 61 (06): : 886 - 893
  • [5] BOTTOMLEY JM, 2003, COMPLEMENTARY THERAP, P131
  • [6] Electromyographic biofeedback for gait training after stroke
    Bradley, L
    Hart, BB
    Mandana, S
    Flowers, K
    Riches, M
    Sanderson, P
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 12 (01) : 11 - 22
  • [7] BURNSIDE IG, 1982, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V63, P217
  • [8] INVESTIGATION OF A NEW MOTOR-ASSESSMENT SCALE FOR STROKE PATIENTS
    CARR, JH
    SHEPHERD, RB
    NORDHOLM, L
    LYNNE, D
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1985, 65 (02): : 175 - 180
  • [9] Ceceli E., 1996, European Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, V6, P141
  • [10] Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond