Biomarkers in imaging: Realizing radiology's future

被引:101
作者
Smith, JJ
Sorensen, AG
Thrall, JH
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Biomarkers Imaging, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Opinions; radiology and radiologists; research; socioeconomic issues;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2273020518
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Modern pharmaceuticals and medical devices have provided substantial benefits to patients throughout the world. These benefits come at a high and increasing cost, with development of the typical pharmaceutical requiring 12 years and hundreds of millions of dollars before gaining U.S. Food and Drug Administration marketing approval. Appropriate use of imaging biomarkers-defined as anatomic, physiologic, biochemical, or molecular parameters detectable with imaging methods used to establish the presence or severity of disease-offer the prospect of smaller, less expensive, and more efficient preclinical studies and clinical trials. Scientists, government regulators, and industry have all recognized the potential of biomarkers in imaging. Although real, this promise can only be realized with the rigorous application of science to their use. Success is most likely when (a) the presence of an imaging marker is closely linked with the presence of a target disease; (b) detection and/or measurement of the biomarker is accurate, reproducible, and feasible over time; and (c) measured changes are closely linked to success or failure of the therapeutic effect of the product being evaluated. By applying this paradigm to the array of imaging modalities, the radiology community is poised to become a major force in preclinical and clinical evaluations of new medical treatments. (C) RSNA 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 638
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Annas George J, 1989, Villanova Law Rev, V34, P771
[2]   Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis [J].
Buyse, M ;
Thirion, P ;
Carlson, RW ;
Burzykowski, T ;
Molenberghs, G ;
Piedbois, P .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) :373-378
[3]   MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY IN PATIENTS RECEIVING ENCAINIDE, FLECAINIDE, OR PLACEBO - THE CARDIAC-ARRHYTHMIA SUPPRESSION TRIAL [J].
ECHT, DS ;
LIEBSON, PR ;
MITCHELL, LB ;
PETERS, RW ;
OBIASMANNO, D ;
BARKER, AH ;
ARENSBERG, D ;
BAKER, A ;
FRIEDMAN, L ;
GREENE, HL ;
HUTHER, ML ;
RICHARDSON, DW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (12) :781-788
[4]   Surrogate end points in clinical trials: Are we being misled? [J].
Fleming, TR ;
DeMets, DL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 125 (07) :605-613
[5]  
KUMA RG, 2002, BIOCENTURY, V10, pA1
[6]   The architecture of government regulation of medical products [J].
Merrill, RA .
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1996, 82 (08) :1753-1866
[7]  
*NAT I HLTH FOOD D, 2003, BIOM SUGG ENDP ADV C
[8]   SURROGATE ENDPOINTS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS - DEFINITION AND OPERATIONAL CRITERIA [J].
PRENTICE, RL .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1989, 8 (04) :431-440
[9]   The promise and peril of surrogate end points in cancer research [J].
Schatzkin, A ;
Gail, M .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2002, 2 (01) :19-27
[10]  
Smith JJ, 2000, FOOD DRUG LAW J, V55, P435