Life-cycle assessment-based comparison of different lignocellulosic ethanol production routes

被引:30
作者
Murali, Govind [1 ]
Shastri, Yogendra [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
来源
BIOFUELS-UK | 2022年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
Life-cycle assessment; ethanol; India; bagasse; water footprint; dilute acid pre-treatment; BAGASSE-DERIVED ETHANOL; FUEL ETHANOL; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; RICE STRAW; BIOETHANOL; SUGARCANE; IMPACT; INDIA; CHALLENGES; MISCANTHUS;
D O I
10.1080/17597269.2019.1670465
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This work conducts a life-cycle assessment (LCA) of ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse in the Indian context. A cradle-to-gate system boundary was considered, and a functional unit of 1?MJ of energy from ethanol was used. Eight pre-treatment technologies and four hydrolysis-fermentation technologies were considered, thereby comparing 32 process combinations. Process data were collected from various published studies, government reports and also personal communication, and were used to perform LCA. The ReCiPe and TRACI models were used to perform the impact assessment using OpenLCA 1.6.1. The results show that the dilute acid pre-treatment (DA) with simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSCF) processing route had lower impacts in most categories. The global warming potential for this combination was 0.132?kg CO2 eq. per MJ, with 85% of the contribution due to steam generation. The impact can be reduced to 0.019?kg CO2 eq. per MJ by using a natural gas for steam generation. Ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) pre-treatment had the highest impact in many categories, primarily due to ammonia production, implying the importance of ammonia recycling. DA had a lower impact due to higher yields and lower biomass requirements. The water footprint ranged between 232 and 672?L/L of ethanol and was mostly dominated by agricultural water.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 247
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   Environmental benefits on a life cycle basis of using bagasse-derived ethanol as a gasoline oxygenate in India [J].
Kadam, KL .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (05) :371-384
[12]   Life cycle assessment of ethanol production from miscanthus: A comparison of production pathways at two European sites [J].
Lask, Jan ;
Wagner, Moritz ;
Trindade, Luisa M. ;
Lewandowski, Iris .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2019, 11 (01) :269-288
[13]  
Malik L., 2015, Promoting low carbon transport in India: Assessment of Heavy Duty Vehicle Characteristics in Delhi
[14]   Ethanol from Indian agro-industrial lignocellulosic biomass-a life cycle evaluation of energy, greenhouse gases, land and water [J].
Mandade, Prasad ;
Bakshi, Bhavik R. ;
Yadav, G. D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (12) :1649-1658
[15]   Grand Challenges for Life-Cycle Assessment of Biofuels [J].
McKone, T. E. ;
Nazaroff, W. W. ;
Berck, P. ;
Auffhammer, M. ;
Lipman, T. ;
Torn, M. S. ;
Masanet, E. ;
Lobscheid, A. ;
Santero, N. ;
Mishra, U. ;
Barrett, A. ;
Bomberg, M. ;
Fingerman, K. ;
Scown, C. ;
Strogen, B. ;
Horvath, A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (05) :1751-1756
[16]   Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic bioethanol: Environmental impacts and energy balance [J].
Morales, Marjorie ;
Quintero, Julian ;
Conejeros, Raul ;
Aroca, German .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :1349-1361
[17]   Characterization of sugarcane and coconut fibers by thermal analysis and FTIR [J].
Mothe, Cheila G. ;
de Miranda, Iara C. .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2009, 97 (02) :661-665
[18]   Integrating enzyme fermentation in lignocellulosic ethanol production: life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis [J].
Olofsson, Johanna ;
Barta, Zsolt ;
Borjesson, Pal ;
Wallberg, Ola .
BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2017, 10
[19]   Environmental and economic hybrid life cycle assessment of bagasse-derived ethanol produced in Brazil [J].
Palma-Rojas, Silvia ;
Caldeira-Pires, Armando ;
Nogueira, Jorge Madeira .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (03) :317-327
[20]   Life cycle assessment Part 2: Current impact assessment practice [J].
Pennington, DW ;
Potting, J ;
Finnveden, G ;
Lindeijer, E ;
Jolliet, O ;
Rydberg, T ;
Rebitzer, G .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 30 (05) :721-739