Life-cycle assessment-based comparison of different lignocellulosic ethanol production routes

被引:30
作者
Murali, Govind [1 ]
Shastri, Yogendra [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
来源
BIOFUELS-UK | 2022年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
Life-cycle assessment; ethanol; India; bagasse; water footprint; dilute acid pre-treatment; BAGASSE-DERIVED ETHANOL; FUEL ETHANOL; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; RICE STRAW; BIOETHANOL; SUGARCANE; IMPACT; INDIA; CHALLENGES; MISCANTHUS;
D O I
10.1080/17597269.2019.1670465
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This work conducts a life-cycle assessment (LCA) of ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse in the Indian context. A cradle-to-gate system boundary was considered, and a functional unit of 1?MJ of energy from ethanol was used. Eight pre-treatment technologies and four hydrolysis-fermentation technologies were considered, thereby comparing 32 process combinations. Process data were collected from various published studies, government reports and also personal communication, and were used to perform LCA. The ReCiPe and TRACI models were used to perform the impact assessment using OpenLCA 1.6.1. The results show that the dilute acid pre-treatment (DA) with simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSCF) processing route had lower impacts in most categories. The global warming potential for this combination was 0.132?kg CO2 eq. per MJ, with 85% of the contribution due to steam generation. The impact can be reduced to 0.019?kg CO2 eq. per MJ by using a natural gas for steam generation. Ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) pre-treatment had the highest impact in many categories, primarily due to ammonia production, implying the importance of ammonia recycling. DA had a lower impact due to higher yields and lower biomass requirements. The water footprint ranged between 232 and 672?L/L of ethanol and was mostly dominated by agricultural water.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 247
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Life-cycle assessment of bioethanol production from sweet sorghum stalks cultivated in the state of Yucatan, Mexico [J].
Aguilar-Sanchez, Patricia ;
Segundo Navarro-Pineda, Freddy ;
Cesar Sacramento-Rivero, Julio ;
Felipe Barahona-Perez, Luis .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2018, 20 (07) :1685-1696
[2]   Energy consumption analysis of integrated flowsheets for production of fuel ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass [J].
Alzate, C. A. Cardona ;
Toro, O. J. Sanchez .
ENERGY, 2006, 31 (13) :2447-2459
[3]   Atmospheric emissions from road transportation in India [J].
Baidya, S. ;
Borken-Kleefeld, J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (10) :3812-3822
[4]   Comparative evaluation of lignocellulosic biorefinery scenarios under a life-cycle assessment approach [J].
Bello, Sara ;
Rios, Carmen ;
Feijoo, Gumersindo ;
Teresa Moreira, Maria .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2018, 12 (06) :1047-1064
[5]   Environmental life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic conversion to ethanol: A review [J].
Borrion, Aiduan Li ;
McManus, Marcelle C. ;
Hammond, Geoffrey P. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (07) :4638-4650
[6]   A comparison of the environmental benefits of bagasse-derived electricity and fuel ethanol on a life-cycle basis [J].
Botha, Tyron ;
von Blottnitz, Harro .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (17) :2654-2661
[7]   Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Stromman, Anders Hammer .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (02) :437-451
[8]  
Confederation of Indian Industry, 2010, EST EN CARB BAL BIOF EST EN CARB BAL BIOF
[9]   Heat capacity measurements of various biomass types and pyrolysis residues [J].
Dupont, Capucine ;
Chiriac, Rodica ;
Gauthier, Guillaume ;
Toche, Francois .
FUEL, 2014, 115 :644-651
[10]  
Eastern Research Group, 1998, REP REV 5 ED AP 42