Automatic Prompting and Positive Attention to Reduce Tongue Protrusion and Head Tilting by Two Adults With Severe to Profound Intellectual Disabilities

被引:8
作者
Lancioni, Giulio E. [1 ]
Singh, Nirbhay N. [2 ]
O'Reilly, Mark F. [3 ]
Sigafoos, Jeff [4 ]
Didden, Robert [5 ]
Pichierri, Sabrina [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bari, Dept Psychol, I-70100 Bari, Italy
[2] ONE Res Inst, Midlothian, VA USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Special Educ, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Educ Psychol & Pedag, Wellington, New Zealand
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Special Educ, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] S Agostino Day Ctr, Noicattaro, BA, Italy
关键词
automatic prompting; positive attention; inappropriate behavior; intellectual disabilities; ON-TASK; NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT; MULTIPLE DISABILITIES; BEHAVIORAL-ASSESSMENT; CHALLENGING BEHAVIOR; YOUNG-CHILDREN; WOMAN; STEREOTYPY; IDENTIFY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1177/0145445510372751
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study assessed a simple behavioral strategy for reducing stereotypic tongue protrusion and forward head tilting displayed by a woman and a man with severe to profound intellectual disabilities. The strategy involved (a) auditory prompting (i.e., verbal encouragements to keep the tongue in the mouth or the head upright) delivered automatically at fixed intervals via a portable device, and (b) social approval delivered by a research assistant at adjustable intervals for the absence of the inappropriate behavior. The intervals arranged for the delivery of approval were extended if the inappropriate behavior occurred in concomitance with the expected delivery. Data showed that the intervention strategy was effective in reducing the stereotypic tongue protrusion and forward head tilting. Their occurrences dropped from above 40% (tongue protrusion) and close to 80% (head tilting) of the observation instances during the initial baseline to around or slightly above 10% of those instances during the second intervention period and the 3-month postintervention check.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 309
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   A comparison of functional behavior assessment methodologies with young children: Descriptive methods and functional analysis [J].
Alter P.J. ;
Conroy M.A. ;
Mancil G.R. ;
Haydon T. .
Journal of Behavioral Education, 2008, 17 (2) :200-219
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Single case experimental designs: Strategies for study behavior change
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, NONPARAMETRIC STAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, VINELAND ADAPTIVE BE
[5]   The use of a positive procedure to increase engagement on-task and decrease challenging behavior [J].
Beare, PL ;
Severson, S ;
Brandt, P .
BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 2004, 28 (01) :28-44
[6]   A variation of noncontingent reinforcement in the treatment of aberrant behavior [J].
Britton, LN ;
Carr, JE ;
Kellum, KK ;
Dozier, CL ;
Weil, TM .
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2000, 21 (06) :425-435
[7]  
Catania A.C., 2007, LEARNING INTERIM 4, V4th
[8]  
Cunningham E, 2000, EDUC TRAIN MENT RET, V35, P406
[9]   Social validation data on three methods of physical restraint: views of consumers, staff and students [J].
Cunningham, J ;
McDonnell, A ;
Easton, S ;
Sturmey, P .
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2003, 24 (04) :307-316
[10]  
DAVIS CA, 1992, EDUC TRAIN MENT RET, V27, P39