Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas

被引:156
作者
Abma, Tineke A. [1 ]
Broerse, Jacqueline E. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO Inst, Dept Med Humanities, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Sci Commun Athena Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
dialogue; interactive approaches; methodology; participation; research agenda setting; responsive evaluation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Collaboration with patients in healthcare and medical research is an emerging development. We aimed to develop a methodology for health research agenda setting processes grounded in the notion of participation as dialogue. Methods We conducted seven case studies between 2003 and 2007 to develop and validate a Dialogue Model for patient participation in health research agenda setting. The case studies related to spinal cord injury, neuromuscular diseases, renal failure, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, burns, diabetes and intellectual disabilities. Results The Dialogue Model is grounded in participatory and interactive approaches and has been adjusted on the basis of pilot work. It has six phases: exploration; consultation; prioritization; integration; programming; and implementation. These phases are discussed and illustrated with a case description of research agenda setting relating to burns. Conclusions The dialogue model appeared relevant and feasible to structure the process of collaboration between stakeholders in several research agenda setting processes. The phase of consultation enables patients to develop their own voice and agenda, and prepares them for the broader collaboration with other stakeholder groups. Challenges include the stimulation of more permanent changes in research, and institutional transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 173
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Power and dialogue: A review of discursive research [J].
Ong, Ben ;
Tseliou, Eleftheria ;
Strong, Tom ;
Buus, Niels .
FAMILY PROCESS, 2023, 62 (04) :1391-1407
[32]   Annotated bibliography on participatory consultations to help aid the inclusion of marginalized perspectives in setting policy agendas [J].
Faraz Rahim Siddiqui .
International Journal for Equity in Health, 13
[33]   Exploring the use of social media and online methods to engage persons with lived experience and healthcare professionals in creating research agendas: Lessons from a pediatric cancer research priority-setting partnership [J].
Hwang, Kyobin ;
Sivaratnam, Surabhi ;
Azeredo, Rita ;
Hashemi, Elham ;
Jibb, Lindsay A. .
PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 3 (01)
[34]   Annotated bibliography on participatory consultations to help aid the inclusion of marginalized perspectives in setting policy agendas [J].
Siddiqui, Faraz Rahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2014, 13
[35]   Shifting of the ontological-epistemological balance in contemporary research agendas: a critique [J].
Gopinath, Deepak .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2015, 49 (05) :1873-1882
[36]   Research agendas: When the roadmap lacks a compass, we are all lost [J].
Burns, Jeffrey .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (01) :345-346
[37]   Children's participation and intergenerational dialogue: Bringing adults back into the analysis [J].
Wyness, Michael .
CHILDHOOD-A GLOBAL JOURNAL OF CHILD RESEARCH, 2013, 20 (04) :429-442
[38]   Dialogue attributes that inform depth and quality of participation in course discussion forums [J].
Farrow, Elaine ;
Moore, Johanna ;
Gasevic, Dragan .
LAK20: THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE, 2020, :129-134
[39]   Dialogue for Fostering Participation or Manipulation: A Phenomenological Study of a Health Care Company [J].
Akella, Devi .
SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (02)
[40]   The food superstore revolution: changing times, changing research agendas in the UK [J].
Hallsworth, Alan ;
de Kervenoael, Ronan ;
Elms, Jonathan ;
Canning, Catherine .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RETAIL DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2010, 20 (01) :135-146