Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas

被引:152
|
作者
Abma, Tineke A. [1 ]
Broerse, Jacqueline E. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO Inst, Dept Med Humanities, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Sci Commun Athena Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
dialogue; interactive approaches; methodology; participation; research agenda setting; responsive evaluation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Collaboration with patients in healthcare and medical research is an emerging development. We aimed to develop a methodology for health research agenda setting processes grounded in the notion of participation as dialogue. Methods We conducted seven case studies between 2003 and 2007 to develop and validate a Dialogue Model for patient participation in health research agenda setting. The case studies related to spinal cord injury, neuromuscular diseases, renal failure, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, burns, diabetes and intellectual disabilities. Results The Dialogue Model is grounded in participatory and interactive approaches and has been adjusted on the basis of pilot work. It has six phases: exploration; consultation; prioritization; integration; programming; and implementation. These phases are discussed and illustrated with a case description of research agenda setting relating to burns. Conclusions The dialogue model appeared relevant and feasible to structure the process of collaboration between stakeholders in several research agenda setting processes. The phase of consultation enables patients to develop their own voice and agenda, and prepares them for the broader collaboration with other stakeholder groups. Challenges include the stimulation of more permanent changes in research, and institutional transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 173
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient involvement in research programming and implementation A responsive evaluation of the Dialogue Model for research agenda setting
    Abma, Tineke A.
    Pittens, Carina A. C. M.
    Visse, Merel
    Elberse, Janneke E.
    Broerse, Jacqueline E. W.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) : 2449 - 2464
  • [2] Dialogue and deliberation: New approaches to including patients in setting health and healthcare research agendas
    Abma, Tineke A.
    ACTION RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (04) : 429 - 450
  • [3] Patient participation in health research: Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries
    Abma, TA
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (10) : 1310 - 1328
  • [4] Participation and dialogue in strategic manufacturing development
    Riis, JO
    Dukovska-Popovska, I
    Johansen, J
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2006, 17 (02) : 176 - 188
  • [5] Learning to mark: exemplars, dialogue and participation in assessment communities
    Handley, Karen
    den Outer, Birgit
    Price, Margaret
    HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 32 (06) : 888 - 900
  • [7] Reconceptualizing dialogue in environmental public participation
    Hamilton, Jennifer Duffield
    Wills-Toker, Caitlin
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2006, 34 (04) : 755 - 775
  • [8] A qualitative interview study to streamline integration of patient participation in research
    Di Meo, Anna-Francesca Jessica
    Goekce, Feyza
    Pfeiffer, Lisa
    Teusen, Clara
    Gehrmann, Jan
    Jung-Sievers, Caroline
    Schneider, Antonius
    Gensichen, Jochen
    De Valerio, Karolina
    Pitschel-Walz, Gabriele
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2025,
  • [9] A formal general setting for dialogue Protocols
    Amgoud, Leila
    Belabbes, Sihem
    Prade, Henri
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: METHODOLOGY, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4183 : 13 - 23
  • [10] THE COMPLEXITY OF "BORDERS": RESEARCH AGENDAS, TERMINOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION
    Ulrich, Peter
    Troitskiy, Sergey
    ZHURNAL FRONTIRNYKH ISSLEDOVANII-JOURNAL OF FRONTIER STUDIES, 2019, 4 (04): : 234 - 256