Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic in planning the future energy systems of developing countries using an integrated MCDM approach in the off-grid areas of Bangladesh

被引:16
作者
Ali, Tausif [1 ]
Aghaloo, Kamaleddin [2 ]
Chiu, Yie-Ru [3 ]
Ahmad, Munir [4 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Energy & Elect Engn, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Hydropower Engn, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[3] Tzu Chi Univ, Ctr Gen Educ, 701 Zhongyang Rd,Sec 3, Hualien 97004, Taiwan
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
关键词
COVID-19; Off-grid; Delphi; BWM; Fuzzy; CoCoSo; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.099
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 epidemic is impeding energy development in developing countries and exacerbating the problems associated with energy planning in off-grid locations. To address such complicated decision making issues and consider scenarios during this long-lasting pandemic, this study proposes a novel integrated MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision Making) approach using the Delphi based FO-BWM (Fuzzy Optimistic Best-Worst Method), IDOCRIW (Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights) and the Aggregated Weighting Method integrated with the CoCoSo method under different normalization methods based on a case study of the off-grid areas in Bangladesh. The results of Delphi analysis showed that a total of five criteria were agreed upon by the expert panel. After integrating 5 normalization methods with CoCoSo and using three weighting methods separately, a total of 15 MCDM models were constructed. Finally, the 8 sorted MCDM models demonstrate that Solar Home System (SHS) and Mini Grid systems need to be prioritized, and the criterion Opportunity of Local Funding (OLF) is essential for choosing between SHS and Mini-Grid systems. Sensitivity analysis showed that the proposed method is effective for easing the dilemmas of energy planning in off-grid areas and provides useful insight to address the impacts of future pandemics on energy planning.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 38
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Technical and economic assessment of hybrid energy systems in South-West Nigeria [J].
Adaramola, M. S. ;
Oyewola, O. M. ;
Paul, S. S. .
ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2012, 30 (04) :533-551
[2]   HSE risk prioritization of molybdenum operation process using extended FMEA approach based on Fuzzy BWM and Z-WASPAS [J].
Akbari R. ;
Dabbagh R. ;
Ghoushchi S.J. .
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 38 (04) :5157-5173
[3]  
Ali T, 2019, INT J RENEW ENERGY R, V9, P1948
[4]   Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the global energy system and the shift progress to renewable energy: Opportunities, challenges, and policy implications [J].
Anh Tuan Hoang ;
Nizetic, Sandro ;
Olcer, Aykut, I ;
Ong, Hwai Chyuan ;
Chen, Wei-Hsin ;
Chong, Cheng Tung ;
Thomas, Sabu ;
Bandh, Suhaib A. ;
Xuan Phuong Nguyen .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 154
[5]   Determinants of off-grid electrification choice and expenditure: Evidence from Bangladesh [J].
Aziz, Shakila ;
Chowdhury, Shahriar Ahmed .
ENERGY, 2021, 219
[6]   Selection of a Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for a Low-Income Household [J].
Babatunde, Olubayo M. ;
Munda, Josiah L. ;
Hamam, Yskandar .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
[7]  
Bank W., 2020, SOLAR POWER PROVIDES
[8]   The effect of normalization tools on green energy sources selection using multi-criteria decision-making approach: A case study in India [J].
Bhowmik, Chiranjib ;
Bhowmik, Sumit ;
Ray, Amitava .
JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 10 (06)
[9]   Assessment of Different Metal Screw Joint Parameters by Using Multiple Criteria Analysis Methods [J].
Cereska, Audrius ;
Podviezko, Askoldas ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras .
METALS, 2018, 8 (05)
[10]  
CICCHETTI DV, 1981, AM J MENT DEF, V86, P127