Integration of auditory and vibrotactile stimuli: Effects of frequency

被引:33
作者
Wilson, E. Courtenay [1 ]
Reed, Charlotte M. [1 ]
Braida, Louis D. [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Elect Res Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
TONOTOPIC ORGANIZATION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; DISCRIMINATION; INTENSITY; SELECTIVITY; MASKING; TOUCH; IDENTIFICATION; SENSITIVITY; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1121/1.3365318
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Perceptual integration of vibrotactile and auditory sinusoidal tone pulses was studied in detection experiments as a function of stimulation frequency. Vibrotactile stimuli were delivered through a single channel vibrator to the left middle fingertip. Auditory stimuli were presented diotically through headphones in a background of 50 dB sound pressure level broadband noise. Detection performance for combined auditory-tactile presentations was measured using stimulus levels that yielded 63% to 77% correct unimodal performance. In Experiment 1, the vibrotactile stimulus was 250 Hz and the auditory stimulus varied between 125 and 2000 Hz. In Experiment 2, the auditory stimulus was 250 Hz and the tactile stimulus varied between 50 and 400 Hz. In Experiment 3, the auditory and tactile stimuli were always equal in frequency and ranged from 50 to 400 Hz. The highest rates of detection for the combined-modality stimulus were obtained when stimulating frequencies in the two modalities were equal or closely spaced (and within the Pacinian range). Combined-modality detection for closely spaced frequencies was generally consistent with an algebraic sum model of perceptual integration; wider-frequency spacings were generally better fit by a Pythagorean sum model. Thus, perceptual integration of auditory and tactile stimuli at near-threshold levels appears to depend both on absolute frequency and relative frequency of stimulation within each modality. (C) 2010 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10.1121/1.3365318]
引用
收藏
页码:3044 / 3059
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Somatosensory evoked fields to large-area vibrotactile stimuli [J].
Jousmäki, V ;
Hari, R .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 110 (05) :905-909
[32]   Presenting Sharp Surface Shapes Using Overlapped Vibrotactile Stimuli [J].
Sakurai, Tatsuma ;
Konyo, Masashi ;
Tadokoro, Satoshi .
2012 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2012, :3302-3309
[33]   Effects of passive and active movement on vibrotactile detection thresholds of the Pacinian channel and forward masking [J].
Yildiz, Mustafa Z. ;
Toker, Ipek ;
Ozkan, Fatma B. ;
Guclu, Burak .
SOMATOSENSORY AND MOTOR RESEARCH, 2015, 32 (04) :262-272
[34]   Stimulus spacing effects in duration perception are larger for auditory stimuli: Data and a model [J].
Penney, Trevor B. ;
Brown, Gordon D. A. ;
Wong, Jonathan K. L. .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 147 :97-104
[35]   Activation in human auditory cortex in relation to the loudness and unpleasantness of low-frequency and infrasound stimuli [J].
Behler, Oliver ;
Uppenkamp, Stefan .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02)
[36]   Enhancement of letter identification by concurrent auditory stimuli of varying duration [J].
de la Rosa, Maria D. ;
Bausenhart, Karin M. .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2018, 190 :38-52
[37]   Discrimination of behaviorally irrelevant auditory stimuli in stage II sleep [J].
Liu, Shuang ;
Sheth, Bhavin R. .
NEUROREPORT, 2009, 20 (02) :207-212
[38]   Perceived Intensity of Vibrotactile Stimuli: Do Your Clothes Really Matter? [J].
Duthoit, Valerie ;
Sieffermann, Jean-Marc ;
Enregle, Eric ;
Blumenthal, David .
HAPTICS: PERCEPTION, DEVICES, CONTROL, AND APPLICATIONS, EUROHAPTICS 2016, PT I, 2016, 9774 :412-418
[39]   Auditory-Olfactory Integration: Congruent or Pleasant Sounds Amplify Odor Pleasantness [J].
Seo, Han-Seok ;
Hummel, Thomas .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 2011, 36 (03) :301-309
[40]   Gap Detection in Pairs of Ultrasound Mid-air Vibrotactile Stimuli [J].
Howard, Thomas ;
Driller, Karina ;
Frier, William ;
Pacchierotti, Claudio ;
Marchal, Maud ;
Hartcher-O'Brien, Jessica .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED PERCEPTION, 2023, 20 (01)