Cell signaling switches HOX-PBX complexes from repressors to activators of transcription mediated by histone deacetylases and histone acetyltransferases

被引:164
作者
Saleh, M
Rambaldi, I
Yang, XJ
Featherstone, MS
机构
[1] McGill Univ, McGill Canc Ctr, Montreal, PQ H3G 1Y6, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Biochem, Montreal, PQ H3G 1Y6, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Mol Oncol Grp, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ H3G 1Y6, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Oncol, Montreal, PQ H3G 1Y6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1128/MCB.20.22.8623-8633.2000
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The Hoxb1 autoregulatory element comprises three HOX-PBX binding sites. Despite the presence of HOXB1 and PBX1, this enhancer fails to activate reporter gene expression in retinoic acid-treated P19 cell monolayers. Activation requires cell aggregation in addition to RA. This suggests that HOX-PBX complexes may repress transcription under some conditions. Consistent with this, multimerized HOX-PBX binding sites repress reporter gene expression in HEK293 cells. We provide a mechanistic basis for repressor function by demonstrating that a corepressor complex, including histone deacetylases (HDACs) 1 and 3, mSIN3B, and N-CoR/SMRT, interacts with PBX1A. We map a site of interaction with HDAC1 to the PBX1 N terminus and show that the PBX partner is required for repression by the HOX-PBX complex. Treatment with the deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A not only relieves repression but also converts the HOX-PBX complex to a net activator of transcription. We show that this activation function is mediated by the recruitment of the coactivator CREB-binding protein by the HOX partner. Interestingly, HOX-PBX complexes are switched from transcriptional repressors to activators in response to protein kinase A signaling or cell aggregation. Together, our results suggest a model whereby the HOX-PBX complex can act as a repressor or activator of transcription via association with corepressors and coactivators. The model implies that cell signaling is a direct determinant of HOX-PBX function in the patterning of the animal embryo.
引用
收藏
页码:8623 / 8633
页数:11
相关论文
共 95 条
[41]   Diverse signaling pathways modulate nuclear receptor recruitment of N-CoR and SMRT complexes [J].
Lavinsky, RM ;
Jepsen, K ;
Heinzel, T ;
Torchia, J ;
Mullen, TM ;
Schiff, R ;
Del-Rio, AL ;
Ricote, M ;
Ngo, S ;
Gemsch, J ;
Hilsenbeck, SG ;
Osborne, CK ;
Glass, CK ;
Rosenfeld, MG ;
Rose, DW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (06) :2920-2925
[42]   Activity regulation of a Hox protein and a role for the homeodomain in inhibiting transcriptional activation [J].
Li, XL ;
Murre, C ;
McGinnis, W .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1999, 18 (01) :198-211
[43]   Activity regulation of Hox proteins, a mechanism for altering functional specificity in development and evolution [J].
Li, XL ;
McGinnis, W .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (12) :6802-6807
[44]   MAPPING AND MUTAGENESIS OF THE AMINO-TERMINAL TRANSCRIPTIONAL REPRESSION DOMAIN OF THE DROSOPHILA KRUPPEL PROTEIN [J].
LICHT, JD ;
HANNAROSE, W ;
REDDY, JC ;
ENGLISH, MA ;
RO, M ;
GROSSEL, M ;
SHAKNOVICH, R ;
HANSEN, U .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 1994, 14 (06) :4057-4066
[45]   Selective repression of transcriptional activators by Pbx1 does not require the homeodomain [J].
Lu, Q ;
Kamps, MP .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (01) :470-474
[46]   DISRUPTION OF THE HOX-1.6 HOMEOBOX GENE RESULTS IN DEFECTS IN A REGION CORRESPONDING TO ITS ROSTRAL DOMAIN OF EXPRESSION [J].
LUFKIN, T ;
DIERICH, A ;
LEMEUR, M ;
MARK, M ;
CHAMBON, P .
CELL, 1991, 66 (06) :1105-1119
[47]  
Mailly F, 1996, MOL CELL BIOL, V16, P5346
[48]  
Maloof JN, 1998, DEVELOPMENT, V125, P181
[49]   Hox proteins meet more partners [J].
Mann, RS ;
Affolter, M .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 8 (04) :423-429
[50]   Extra specificity from extradenticle: The partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins [J].
Mann, RS ;
Chan, SK .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 1996, 12 (07) :258-262