Contracting emission reduction for supply chains considering market low-carbon preference

被引:238
作者
Wang, Qinpeng [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Daozhi [1 ,3 ]
He, Longfei [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Univ Econ & Business, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Shijiazhuang 050062, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Inst Mfg & Logist, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
关键词
Low carbon SCM; Contracting emission reduction; Cost-sharing contract; Wholesale price premium contract; Low carbon preference; CONSUMER ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS; GAME-THEORY; COORDINATION; COMPONENTS; DYNAMICS; DESIGN; PRICES; MODELS; TAX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.049
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the low-carbon environment, we focus on a dyadic supply chain with a manufacturer and a retailer to develop a game model for studying the issues of carbon emission reduction within the retailer dominant and the power balanced cases, respectively. The consumers are assumed to be of environmental consciousness and accordingly will note the carbon footprint of product when shopping. We find that with the cost-sharing and the wholesale price premium contracts, the retailer can achieve the goal of jointly reducing carbon emissions with the manufacturer, which can promote the manufacturer to increase the carbon emission reduction rate and raise the profit of supply chain. In both the retailer dominant case and the power balance case, the cost-sharing contract can result in Pareto improvement in the performance of both the manufacturer and the retailer. However, the wholesale price premium contract can increase the profit of the supply chain only when the level of low carbon preference is high in the retailer dominant case, and it can also represent a Pareto improvement for the supply chain even if when the level of low carbon preference is low in the power balanced case. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 84
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   German car buyers' willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions [J].
Achtnicht, Martin .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 113 (3-4) :679-697
[2]   Does demand fall when customers perceive that prices are unfair? The case of premium pricing for large sizes [J].
Anderson, Eric T. ;
Simester, Duncan I. .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2008, 27 (03) :492-500
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANN OPER RES
[4]   Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply Chains: Insights From Simple Models [J].
Benjaafar, Saif ;
Li, Yanzhi ;
Daskin, Mark .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2013, 10 (01) :99-116
[5]   On the design of optimal grandfathering schemes for emission allowances [J].
Böhringer, C ;
Lange, A .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 49 (08) :2041-2055
[6]   Carbon taxes with exemptions in an open economy: A general equilibrium analysis of the German tax initiative [J].
Bohringer, C ;
Rutherford, TF .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 32 (02) :189-203
[7]  
Brandenburg M., 2015, ANN OPER RES
[8]   Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions [J].
Brandenburg, Marcus ;
Govindan, Kannan ;
Sarkis, Joseph ;
Seuring, Stefan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 233 (02) :299-312
[9]  
Cachon GP, 2003, HDBK OPER R, V11, P229, DOI 10.1016/s0927-0507(03)11006-7
[10]   Risk-Neutral Models for Emission Allowance Prices and Option Valuation [J].
Carmona, Rene ;
Hinz, Juri .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (08) :1453-1468