Dating Violence Perpetration: Associations With Early Maladaptive Schemas

被引:9
作者
Shorey, Ryan C. [1 ]
Strauss, Catherine [1 ]
Zapor, Heather [2 ]
Stuart, Gregory L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio Univ, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN USA
关键词
dating violence; aggression; early maladaptive schema; young adults; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; PHYSICAL AGGRESSION; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; EMOTIONAL ABUSE; YOUNG; ANGER; QUESTIONNAIRE; PREVALENCE; SYMPTOMS; DISORDER;
D O I
10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00175
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Violence between dating couples is a serious and prevalent problem among college students (Shorey, Cornelius, & Bell, 2008). Social-cognitive theories of aggression (e. g., Berkowitz, 1990) propose that perpetrators may have more maladaptive cognitive schemas that increase risk for aggression than non-perpetrators. Thus, this study examined differences between perpetrators and non-perpetrators of dating violence on early maladaptive schemas, which are rigidly held cognitive and behavioral patterns that guide how individuals encode and respond to stimuli in their environments (Young, Klosko, & Weishaar, 2003). Within a sample of female (n = 242) and male (n = 193) college students, results demonstrated that many early maladaptive schema domains were associated with psychological and physical dating violence perpetration, although mostly for women. In addition, the schema domain of impaired autonomy showed medium-to-large differences between female perpetrators and non-perpetrators, whereas the domain of impaired limits showed a medium-to-large difference for male perpetrators and non-perpetrators of physical aggression. These findings add to a growing body of literature on risk factors for dating violence, suggesting that early maladaptive schemas may be associated with individual differences in aggression risk. The results also further support social-cognitive models of aggressive behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 727
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Human aggression [J].
Anderson, CA ;
Bushman, BJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 53 :27-51
[2]  
Archer J, 2000, PSYCHOL BULL, V126, P651, DOI [10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651, 10.1037//0033-2909.126.5.651]
[3]  
Baker C.R., 2008, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, V17, P227, DOI DOI 10.1080/10926770802344836
[4]  
Ball S.A., 2007, COGNITIVE SCHEMAS CO, P111, DOI DOI 10.1037/11561-006:10.1037/11561-006
[5]   Addicted patients with personality disorders: Traits, schemas, and presenting problems [J].
Ball, SA ;
Cecero, JJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2001, 15 (01) :72-83
[6]   Intimate partner violence theoretical considerations: Moving towards a contextual framework [J].
Bell, Kathryn M. ;
Naugle, Amy E. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 28 (07) :1096-1107
[7]  
Bell Kathryn M, 2007, Violence Vict, V22, P243, DOI 10.1891/088667007780477348
[9]   Individual differences in the extent and development of aggressive cognitive-associative networks [J].
Bushman, BJ .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1996, 22 (08) :811-819
[10]   Assessment of dysfunctional beliefs in borderline personality disorder [J].
Butler, AC ;
Brown, GK ;
Beck, AT ;
Grisham, JR .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2002, 40 (10) :1231-1240