共 19 条
A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of High Cutoff Versus Standard Hemofiltration in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury
被引:46
作者:
Atan, Rafidah
[1
]
Peck, Leah
[2
]
Prowle, John
[3
,4
,5
]
Licari, Elisa
[6
]
Eastwood, Glenn M.
[2
]
Storr, Markus
[7
]
Goehl, Hermann
[7
]
Bellomo, Rinaldo
[2
,8
]
机构:
[1] Monash Univ Malaysia, Clin Sch Johor Bahru, Jeffrey Cheah Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
[2] Austin Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[3] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Royal London Hosp, Adult Crit Care Unit, London, England
[4] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Royal London Hosp, Dept Renal & Transplant Med, London, England
[5] Queen Mary Univ London, William Harvey Res Inst, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, London, England
[6] Alfred Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Prahran, Vic, Australia
[7] Gambro Dialysatoren GmbH, Res & Dev, Hechingen, Germany
[8] Univ Melbourne, Sch Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词:
acute kidney injury;
blood purification;
critical illness;
hemofiltration;
high cutoff filter;
super high flux filter;
EXTRACORPOREAL CYTOKINE REMOVAL;
RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY;
SEPTIC PATIENTS;
HEMOFILTERS;
FAILURE;
SEPSIS;
D O I:
10.1097/CCM.0000000000003350
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
Objectives: In critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving vasopressors, high cytokine levels may sustain the shock state. High cutoff hemofiltration achieves greater cytokine removal in ex vivo and in animal models and may reduce the duration of shock but may also increase albumin losses. Design: This was a single-center double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing continuous venovenous hemofiltration-high cutoff to continuous venovenous hemofiltration-standard. Setting: Tertiary care hospital in Australia. Patients: Vasopressor-dependent patients in acute kidney injury who were admitted to the ICU. Interventions: Norepinephrine-free time were calculated in critically ill vasopressor-dependent patients in acute kidney injury, randomized to either continuous venovenous hemofiltration-high cutoff or continuous venovenous hemofiltration-standard. Measurement and Main Results: A total of 76 patients were randomized with the following characteristics (continuous venovenous hemofiltration-high cutoff vs continuous venovenous hemofiltration-standard); median age of 65 versus 70 year, percentage of males 47% versus 68%, and median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores of 25 versus 23.5. The median hours of norepinephrine-free time at day 7 were 32 (0-110.8) for continuous venovenous hemofiltration-high cutoff and 56 hours (0-109.3hr) (p = 0.520) for continuous venovenous hemofiltration-standard. Inhospital mortality was 55.6% with continuous venovenous hemofiltration-high cutoff versus 34.2% with continuous venovenous hemofiltration-standard (adjusted odds ratio, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.81-7.66; p = 0.191). There was no significant difference in time to cessation of norepinephrine (p = 0.358), time to cessation of hemofiltration (p = 0.563), and filter life (p = 0.21). Serum albumin levels (p = 0.192) were similar and the median dose of IV albumin given was 90 grams (20-212 g) for continuous venovenous hemofiltration-high cutoff and 80 grams (15-132 g) for continuous venovenous hemofiltration-standard (p = 0.252). Conclusions: In critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, continuous venovenous hemofiltration-high cutoff did not reduce the duration of vasopressor support or mortality or change albumin levels compared with continuous venovenous hemofiltration-standard.
引用
收藏
页码:E988 / E994
页数:7
相关论文