Evaluation of the bactericidal effect of five products for surgical hand disinfection according to prEN 12054 and prEN 12791

被引:50
作者
Marchetti, MG
Kampf, G
Finzi, G
Salvatorelli, G
机构
[1] Univ Ferrara, Dipartimento Biol, Sez Anat Comparata, Cattedra Citol & Istol, I-44100 Ferrara, Italy
[2] Bode Chem GmbH & Co, Sci Affairs, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Policlin S Orsola, Direz Azienda Osped Bologna, Malpighi, Italy
关键词
surgical hand; disinfection; bactericidal activity; prEN; 12054; 12791;
D O I
10.1016/S0195-6701(03)00039-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Surgical hand disinfection (with an alcohol-based hand rub) and surgical handwash (with an antiseptic-based liquid soap) are accepted measures to reduce the risk for surgical site infections. The new European Standards allow a comparison of their antimicrobial efficacy. The bactericidal activity of surgical hand rubs [Sterillium and Softaman, (active ingredient = alcohols)] and handwashes [Derman plus (triclosan), Hibiscrub (chlorhexidine) and Betadine (PVP-iodine)] was tested according to the prEN 12054 suspension test using Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus hirae, and to prEN 12791 for the effect on resident skin flora in comparison with 1-propanol, 60% (v/v). All five products achieved a reduction of test bacteria within 3 min of > 10(5)-fold so fulfilling prEN 12054. However, only Hibiscrub, Sterillium and Softa Man met the requirements of prEN 12791, giving a mean reduction of resident micro-organisms (immediate and sustained effect) which was not significantly tower than the reference alcohol (P > 0.1; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test). Sterillium was significantly more effective than the reference alcohol (immediate and sustained affect). Products for surgical hand disinfection may have equal antimicrobial activity in suspension tests but show large differences under practical conditions. Healthcare workers should not rely on results from suspension tests when deciding on a product for surgical hand disinfection. (C) 2003 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 67
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, RENCE AM J INFECT CO
[2]  
GIRARD R, 1996, HYGIENES, V12, P34
[3]  
GRINBAUM RS, 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P198
[4]  
Kampf G, 1996, Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd, V113, P698
[5]   Intra-laboratory reproducibility of the hand hygiene reference procedures of EN 1499 (hygienic handwash) and EN 1500 (hygienic hand disinfection) [J].
Kampf, G ;
Ostermeyer, C .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2002, 52 (03) :219-224
[6]   Spectrum of antimicrobial activity and user acceptability of the hand disinfectant agent Sterillium® Gel [J].
Kampf, G ;
Rudolf, M ;
Labadie, JC ;
Barrett, SP .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2002, 52 (02) :141-147
[7]   Limited effectiveness of chlorhexidine based hand disinfectants against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [J].
Kampf, G ;
Jarosch, R ;
Ruden, H .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1998, 38 (04) :297-303
[8]  
Kampf G, 1998, ZBL HYG UMWELTMED, V200, P457
[9]  
Kampf G, 1996, CHIRURG, V67, P637
[10]   Efficacy of hand disinfectants against vancomycin-resistant enterococci in vitro [J].
Kampf, G ;
Höfer, M ;
Wendt, C .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1999, 42 (02) :143-150