A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Nezhat, Farr [1 ]
Erfani, Hadi [2 ,3 ]
Nezhat, Camran [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Surg Gynecol & Oncol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] NYU Long Isl Sch Med, NYU Langone Hosp Long Isl, Mineola, NY USA
[3] NYU Winthrop Hosp, Minimally Invas Gynecol Surg & Robot, Mineola, NY USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Camran Nezhat Inst, Minimally Invas & Robot Surg, Woodside, CA 94061 USA
关键词
Cervical cancer; fertility-sparing surgery; pregnancy outcomes; ABDOMINAL RADICAL TRACHELECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; VAGINAL TRACHELECTOMY; OBSTETRIC OUTCOMES; PRESERVING-OPTION; CASE SERIES; SUBSEQUENT PREGNANCY; HYSTERECTOMY; PRESERVATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2022.2022-9-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In this review, we aim to evaluate the current literature on reproductive and oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (stage IA1-IB1). This is a systematic review of the existing literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist to report on fertility-sparing surgery and its outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer. Outcomes of interest were subsequent clinical pregnancy rate, reproductive outcomes, and cancer recurrence outcomes. Included in this systematic review were 68 studies encompassing 3,592 patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Of these, reproductive outcomes were reported in 1096 pregnancies. The mean clinical pregnancy rate was 53.2%. Those who underwent vaginal radical trachelectomy had the highest clinical pregnancy rate (67.5%). The mean live birth rate was 67.8% in our study. Twenty-one percent of pregnancies after fertility-sparing surgery required assisted reproductive technology. The mean cancer recurrence rate was 3.2%, and the cancer death rate was 0.6% after a median follow-up period of 40.1 months with no statistically significant difference across surgical approaches. Offering fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer is reasonable. Highest clinical pregnancy rate is associated with vaginal radical trachelectomy. Moreover oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive approaches were comparable with abdominal approaches. We encourage detailed preoperative counseling and multidisciplinary approach to achieve best outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 313
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer ≥ 2 cm: Can One Still Effectively Become a Mother? A Systematic Review of Fertility Outcomes
    Carlo Ronsini
    M. C. Solazzo
    R. Molitierno
    P. De Franciscis
    F. Pasanisi
    L. Cobellis
    N. Colacurci
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 5587 - 5596
  • [42] Is it time to broaden the scope of fertility-sparing treatments for early-stage cervical cancer?
    Mari-Alexandre, Josep
    Gilabert-Estelles, Juan
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 115 (01) : 81 - 82
  • [43] Abdominal Radical Trachelectomy in Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Cibula, David
    Slama, Jiri
    Svarovsky, Jiri
    Fischerova, Daniela
    Freitag, Pavel
    Zikan, Michal
    Pinkavova, Iva
    Pavlista, David
    Dundr, Pavel
    Hill, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2009, 19 (08) : 1407 - 1411
  • [44] ONCOLOGICAL AND REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOMES AFTER FERTILITY-SPARING SURGERY IN WOMEN WITH CERVICAL CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Tzafetas, M.
    Mitra, A.
    Lever, S.
    Kalliala, I.
    MacIntyre, D.
    Ghaem-Maghami, S.
    Kyrgiou, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A76 - A77
  • [45] Fertility-sparing trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A proposal of an ideal candidate
    Machida, Hiroko
    Iwata, Takashi
    Okugawa, Kaoru
    Matsuo, Koji
    Saito, Tsuyoshi
    Tanaka, Kyoko
    Morishige, Kenichiro
    Kobayashi, Hiroaki
    Yoshino, Kiyoshi
    Tokunaga, Hideki
    Ikeda, Tomoaki
    Shozu, Makio
    Yaegashi, Nobuo
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    Mikami, Mikio
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 156 (02) : 341 - 348
  • [46] Fertility-sparing options for early stage cervical cancer
    Gien, Lilian T.
    Covens, Allan
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) : 350 - 357
  • [47] Role of preoperative MRI in improving the selection of patients with early-stage cervical cancer for fertility-sparing surgery
    Lakhman, Y.
    Akin, O.
    Park, K.
    Zheng, J.
    Sohn, M.
    Moskowitz, C.
    Sarasohn, D.
    Sonoda, Y.
    Hricak, H.
    Abu-Rustum, N.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 : S26 - S27
  • [48] Fertility-sparing surgery for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: Open versus robotic radical trachelectomy
    Nick, A.
    Frumovitz, M.
    Schmeler, K.
    Soliman, P.
    Ramirez, P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) : S127 - S128
  • [49] Fertility-sparing Surgery for Presumed Early-stage Invasive Cervical Cancer: A Survey of Practice in the United Kingdom
    Tzafetas, Menelaos
    Mitra, Anita
    Kalliala, Ilkka
    Lever, Sarah
    Fotopoulou, Christina
    Farthing, Alan
    Smith, John Richard
    Martin-Hirsch, Pierre
    Paraskevaidis, Evangelos
    Kyrgiou, Maria
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (06) : 3641 - 3646
  • [50] Fertility-sparing surgery and fertility preservation in cervical cancer: The desire for parenthood, reproductive and obstetric outcomes
    van der Plas, R. C. J.
    Bos, A. M. E.
    Jurgenliemk-Schulz, I. M.
    Gerestein, C. G.
    Zweemer, R. P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 163 (03) : 538 - 544