The pandemic of online research in times of COVID-19

被引:70
作者
De Man, Jeroen [1 ]
Campbell, Linda [2 ]
Tabana, Hanani [3 ]
Wouters, Edwin [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Sociol, Ctr Populat Family & Hlth, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Western Cape, Sch Publ Hlth, Fac Community & Hlth, Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Univ Free State, Ctr Hlth Syst Res & Dev, Bloemfontein, South Africa
关键词
COVID-19; statistics & research methods; social medicine; public health; mental health; psychiatry;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043866
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an explosion of online research using rating scales. While this approach can be useful, two of the major challenges affecting the quality of this type of research include selection bias and the use of non-validated scales. Online research is prone to various forms of selection bias, including self-selection bias, non-response bias or only reaching specific subgroups. The use of rating scales requires contextually validated scales that meet psychometrical properties such as validity, reliability and-for cross-country comparisons-invariance across settings. We discuss options to prevent or tackle these challenges. Researchers, readers, editors and reviewers need to take a critical stance towards research using this type of methodology.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Social media as a recruitment platform for a nationwide online survey of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, and practices in the United States: methodology and feasibility analysis [J].
Ali, Shahmir H. ;
Foreman, Joshua ;
Capasso, Ariadna ;
Jones, Abbey M. ;
Tozan, Yesim ;
DiClemente, Ralph J. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
[2]   Disentangling depression in Belgian higher education students amidst the first COVID-19 lockdown (April-May 2020) [J].
De Man, Jeroen ;
Buffel, Veerle ;
van de Velde, Sarah ;
Bracke, Piet ;
Van Hal, Guido F. ;
Wouters, Edwin .
ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 79 (01)
[4]   Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research [J].
Eysenbach, Gunther ;
Wyatt, Jeremy .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2002, 4 (02) :76-94
[5]   Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations [J].
Hobart, Jeremy C. ;
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Zajicek, John P. ;
Thompson, Alan J. .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2007, 6 (12) :1094-1105
[6]   A PRACTICAL AND THEORETICAL GUIDE TO MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE IN AGING RESEARCH [J].
HORN, JL ;
MCARDLE, JJ .
EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 1992, 18 (3-4) :117-144
[7]   Reflections on and test of the metrological properties of summated rating, Likert, and other scales based on sums of ordinal variables [J].
Kampen, Jarl K. .
MEASUREMENT, 2019, 137 :428-434
[8]   Big Data and Large Sample Size: A Cautionary Note on the Potential for Bias [J].
Kaplan, Robert M. ;
Chambers, David A. ;
Glasgow, Russell E. .
CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2014, 7 (04) :342-346
[9]   Research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science [J].
O'Connor, Daryl B. ;
Aggleton, John P. ;
Chakrabarti, Bhismadev ;
Cooper, Cary L. ;
Creswell, Cathy ;
Dunsmuir, Sandra ;
Fiske, Susan T. ;
Gathercole, Susan ;
Gough, Brendan ;
Ireland, Jane L. ;
Jones, Marc, V ;
Jowett, Adam ;
Kagan, Carolyn ;
Karanika-Murray, Maria ;
Kaye, Linda K. ;
Kumari, Veena ;
Lewandowsky, Stephan ;
Lightman, Stafford ;
Malpass, Debra ;
Meins, Elizabeth ;
Morgan, B. Paul ;
Coulthard, Lisa J. Morrison ;
Reicher, Stephen D. ;
Schacter, Daniel L. ;
Sherman, Susan M. ;
Simms, Victoria ;
Williams, Antony ;
Wykes, Til ;
Armitage, Christopher J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 111 (04) :603-629
[10]   Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research [J].
Putnick, Diane L. ;
Bornstein, Marc H. .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2016, 41 :71-90