Calcium intake and colorectal adenoma risk: Dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies

被引:40
作者
Keum, NaNa [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Dong Hoon [1 ,2 ]
Greenwood, Darren C. [3 ]
Zhang, Xuehong [4 ,5 ]
Giovannucci, Edward L. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Leeds, Div Biostat, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Channing Div Network Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
calcium intake; colorectal adenomas; dose-response meta-analysis; prospective observational studies; LIFE-STYLE FACTORS; VITAMIN-D; SUPPLEMENTAL CALCIUM; DIETARY CALCIUM; FUNNEL PLOTS; COLON-CANCER; RECURRENCE; POLYPS; WOMEN; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.29164
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests that calcium may protect against recurrence of colorectal adenomas, which could lead to the subsequent prevention of cancer. Yet the trials used only a large single dose and were of small sizes, and thus, knowledge of the dose-response relationship and influence on high-risk adenomas is limited. To address these issues, we conducted linear and nonlinear dose-response meta-analyses primarily based on prospective observational studies published up to July 2014 identified from PubMed and Embase. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for total and supplemental calcium intake, respectively, using a random-effects model. For total calcium intake, summary RR for each 300 mg/day increase was 0.95 (95% CI=0.92-0.98; I-2=45%; eight studies with 11,005 cases; range of intake=333-2,229 mg/day). Evidence of nonlinearity was indicated: approximately, compared to 550 mg/day of total calcium intake, the summary RR was 0.92 (95% CI=0.89-0.94) at 1,000 mg/day and 0.87 (95% CI=0.84-0.90) at 1,450 mg/day (p(nonlinearity)<0.01). Associations were stronger for high-risk adenomas (1 cm in diameter, (tubulo)villous histology, dysplasia, or multiplicity): approximately, compared to 550 mg/day of total calcium intake, the summary RR was 0.77 (95% CI=0.74-0.81) at 1,000 mg/day and reduced to 0.69 (95% CI=0.66-0.73) at 1,450 mg/da (p(nonlinearity)<0.01). For supplemental calcium intake, summary RR of total adenoma risk for each 300 mg/day increase was 0.96 (95% CI=0.93-0.99; I-2=0%; three studies with 4,548 cases; range of supplementation=0-1,366 mg/day). In conclusion, calcium intake may continue to decrease the risk of adenomas, particularly high-risk adenomas, over a wide range of calcium intake. What's new? Calcium protects against colorectal cancer recurrence, according to a recent study. But just how much calcium is enough to achieve a protective effect? In this study, the authors analyzed a number of previous papers presenting data on calcium supplements and risk of colorectal adenomas. They showed that within the range of 333 mg/day up to 2,229 mg/day of calcium, as intake increased, risk of adenomas - particularly high-risk adenomas - decreased. Thus, calcium may continue to decrease the risk of high-risk colorectal adenomas, precursors of cancer, over a wide range of intake.
引用
收藏
页码:1680 / 1687
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effects of Supplemental Calcium and Vitamin D3 on the APC/β-Catenin Pathway in the Normal Mucosa of Colorectal Adenoma Patients [J].
Ahearn, Thomas U. ;
Shaukat, Aasma ;
Flanders, W. Dana ;
Rutherford, Robin E. ;
Bostick, Roberd M. .
CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (10) :1247-1256
[2]  
[Anonymous], GLOB 2012 EST CANC I
[3]   Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D and risk of cardiovascular events: reanalysis of the Women's Health Initiative limited access dataset and meta-analysis [J].
Bolland, Mark J. ;
Grey, Andrew ;
Avenell, Alison ;
Gamble, Greg D. ;
Reid, Ian R. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342
[4]  
Boyapati SM, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P631
[5]  
BUSET M, 1986, CANCER RES, V46, P5426
[6]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[7]   Dealing With Dietary Measurement Error in Nutritional Cohort Studies [J].
Freedman, Laurence S. ;
Schatzkin, Arthur ;
Midthune, Douglas ;
Kipnis, Victor .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (14) :1086-1092
[8]   Lifestyle Factors and Their Combined Impact on the Risk of Colorectal Polyps [J].
Fu, Zhenming ;
Shrubsole, Martha J. ;
Smalley, Walter E. ;
Wu, Huiyun ;
Chen, Zhi ;
Shyr, Yu ;
Ness, Reid M. ;
Zheng, Wei .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 176 (09) :766-776
[9]  
Giovannucci E., 2006, CANC EPIDEMIOLOGY PR, V3rd, P809
[10]   METHODS FOR TREND ESTIMATION FROM SUMMARIZED DOSE-RESPONSE DATA, WITH APPLICATIONS TO METAANALYSIS [J].
GREENLAND, S ;
LONGNECKER, MP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 135 (11) :1301-1309