Wild fruit use among early farmers in the Neolithic (5400-2300 cal BC) in the north-east of the Iberian Peninsula: an intensive practice?

被引:61
作者
Antolin, Ferran [1 ]
Jacomet, Stefanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Integrat Prehist & Archaeol Sci IPNA IPAS, Dept Environm Sci, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Archaeobotany; Catalonia; Andorra; Wild edible plants; Taphonomy; Gathering; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00334-014-0483-x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The archaeobotanical record of 24 sites from the Neolithic period (5400-2300 cal BC) in the north-east of the Iberian Peninsula is evaluated. Remarkable amounts of data have recently been obtained for the early and middle Neolithic phases. Most of the studied sites were dry and they only yielded charred plant material. Among dry sites, several types of context were evaluated: dwelling areas, hearths, roasting pits and byres. Material was also analysed from a waterlogged cultural layer of one early Neolithic lakeshore site, La Draga. Quercus sp. (acorns), Corylus avellana L. (hazelnuts), Pistacia lentiscus L. (mastic fruits) and Vitis vinifera L. var. sylvestris (wild grapes) were among the most frequently encountered fruits and seeds. Their presence in the archaeobotanical record clearly maps their past ecological distribution in the region. There are differences observed between the charred dry-land material and the waterlogged uncharred material. Wild fruits were mostly present in an uncharred state in La Draga. Therefore, their consumption could go unnoticed in dry sites when fruits were eaten raw or without roasting. Larger amounts of charred remains of certain wild fruits like acorns and hazelnuts found in mountain areas are highlighted as potential evidence of the regular practice of roasting, potentially indicating regional traditions. All in all, our results support an intensive wild plant use at least during the first 1,300 years of the Neolithic period. Evidence of wild plant food consumption becomes scanty towards the second phase of the middle and the late Neolithic (4th and 3rd millennium cal BC). This, however, might also be due to taphonomic reasons.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 33
页数:15
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [31] Buxo R., 2000, MONOGRAFIES CASC, V2, P129
  • [32] Cappers ReneT. J., 2006, DIGITAL SEED ATLAS N
  • [33] de Bolos O, 2005, FLORA MANUAL PAISOS
  • [34] Shepherds and plants in the Alps:: multi-proxy archaeobotanical analysis of neolithic dung from "La Grande Rivoire" (Isere, France)
    Delhon, Claire
    Martin, Lucie
    Argant, Jacqueline
    Thiebault, Stephanie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 35 (11) : 2937 - 2952
  • [35] Ertug-Yaras F, 1997, THESIS ST LOUIS
  • [36] GATHERING IN ARGOLID - SUBSISTENCE SUBSYSTEM IN A GREEK AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITY
    FORBES, MHC
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES-SERIES, 1976, 268 (FEB10): : 251 - 264
  • [37] Gassiot E, 2012, CUATERN GEOMORFOL, V26, P29
  • [38] Gausachs R, 2007, HERBES REMEIERES CUL, V1
  • [39] Gausachs R, 2008, HERBES REMEIERES CUL, V2
  • [40] Harild J. A., 2007, Grauballe Man. An Iron Age Bog Revisited, P154