An Assessment of Patient Comfort and Morbidity After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Suprapubic Tube Versus Urethral Catheter Drainage

被引:21
作者
Morgan, Monica S. C. [1 ]
Ozayar, Asim [1 ]
Friedlander, Justin I. [1 ]
Shakir, Nabeel [1 ]
Antonelli, Jodi A. [1 ]
Bedir, Selahattin [1 ]
Roehrborn, Claus G. [1 ]
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Urol, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd,J8-106, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1089/end.2015.0206
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with suprapubic tube (SPT), compared to urethral catheter (UC) drainage, has been proposed to improve patient comfort and recovery. We sought to compare short-term outcomes for pain and morbidity after RALP with SPT vs UC drainage. Methods: Between August 2012 and 2014, 159 men underwent a RALP and prospectively completed a questionnaire addressing postoperative pain and satisfaction. Group 1 (n = 94) underwent a RALP by one surgeon who placed a UC and removed it between postoperative day (POD) 7 and 10. Group 2 (n = 65) underwent a RALP by a different surgeon who placed an SPT and UC. On POD 1, the UC was removed. On POD 9, the SPT was capped and removed on POD 11 if the patient was voiding adequately. Preoperative and intraoperative data, complications, questionnaires, and patient-reported morbidity, including unplanned telephone calls and emergency department (ED) visits, were compared between groups. Results: Patient characteristics were similar between groups. One week after surgery, the penile pain score was statistically significantly lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (56.9% and 79.8%, respectively, reported minimal-to-moderate pain, p = 0.003). Bladder spasms and overall pain were not significantly higher for Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p > 0.05). When asked "How big a problem has your urine storage device been?," 20.2% of patients in Group 1 reported it as a "moderate-to-big" problem compared to 10.8% in Group 2 (p > 0.05). The number of catheter-related unplanned telephone encounters did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.7), however, although not statistically significant, 4.6% of patients in Group 2 presented to the ED with catheter-related issues (p = 0.07). Conclusion: SPT after RALP was associated with less penile pain compared to UC drainage, and modestly better patient satisfaction. There were no significant differences in bladder spasms, overall pain, and patient-reported morbidity between groups. © Copyright 2016, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2016.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 305
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Changes in Penile Length After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Engel, Jason D. ;
Sutherland, Douglas E. ;
Williams, Stephen B. ;
Wagner, Kristofer R. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) :65-69
[22]   Urodynamic Evaluation Before and Immediately After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Kadono, Yoshifumi ;
Ueno, Satoru ;
Yaegashi, Hiroshi ;
Ofude, Mitsuo ;
Izumi, Kouji ;
Maeda, Yuji ;
Mizokami, Atsushi ;
Miwa, Sotaro ;
Miyagi, Tohru ;
Namiki, Mikio .
UROLOGY, 2014, 84 (01) :106-111
[23]   Community-based Outcomes of Open versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Herlemann, Annika ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (02) :215-223
[24]   Comparative Effectiveness of Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy Cancer Control [J].
Hu, Jim C. ;
Gandaglia, Giorgio ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Nguyen, Paul L. ;
Trinh, Quoc-Dien ;
Shih, Ya-Chen Tina ;
Abdollah, Firas ;
Chamie, Karim ;
Wright, Jonathan L. ;
Ganz, Patricia A. ;
Sun, Maxine .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (04) :666-672
[25]   Impact of Posterior Urethral Plate Repair on Continence Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Kim, Isaac Yi ;
Hwang, Eun A. ;
Mmeje, Chinedu ;
Ercolani, Matthew ;
Lee, Dong Hyeon .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 51 (03) :427-431
[26]   Longitudinal changes in factors affecting postoperative patient satisfaction after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an assessment using a patient-reported questionnaire [J].
Ogawa, Soichiro ;
Yaginuma, Kei ;
Harigane, Yuki ;
Makabe, Shunta ;
Imai, Hitomi ;
Meguro, Satoru ;
Tanji, Ryo ;
Onagi, Akifumi ;
Honda-Takinami, Ruriko ;
Matsuoka, Kanako ;
Hoshi, Seiji ;
Hata, Junya ;
Sato, Yuichi ;
Akaihata, Hidenori ;
Kataoka, Masao ;
Uemura, Motohide ;
Kojima, Yoshiyuki .
BMC UROLOGY, 2025, 25 (01)
[27]   Radical Prostatectomy After Previous Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy in a Matched-Pair Analysis [J].
Martinschek, Andreas ;
Heinzelmann, Kathrin ;
Ritter, Manuel ;
Heinrich, Elmar ;
Trojan, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (09) :1136-1141
[28]   Incidence and impact of acute urinary retention after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Shahait, Mohammed ;
Hockenberry, Mark ;
Suzy, N. A. ;
Kim, Jessica ;
McWilliams, Kellie ;
Lee, David, I .
PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (03) :121-124
[29]   Apical Margins after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Does Technique Matter? [J].
Guru, Khurshid A. ;
Perlmutter, Adam E. ;
Sheldon, Matthew J. ;
Butt, Zubair M. ;
Zhang, Shaozeng ;
Tan, Wei ;
Wilding, Gregory ;
Kim, Hyung L. ;
Mohler, James L. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (01) :123-127
[30]   Functional Outcomes in African-Americans After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
DeCastro, G. Joel ;
Jayram, Gautam ;
Razmaria, Aria ;
Shalhav, Arieh ;
Zagaja, Gregory P. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (08) :1013-1019