An Assessment of Patient Comfort and Morbidity After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Suprapubic Tube Versus Urethral Catheter Drainage

被引:21
|
作者
Morgan, Monica S. C. [1 ]
Ozayar, Asim [1 ]
Friedlander, Justin I. [1 ]
Shakir, Nabeel [1 ]
Antonelli, Jodi A. [1 ]
Bedir, Selahattin [1 ]
Roehrborn, Claus G. [1 ]
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Urol, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd,J8-106, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1089/end.2015.0206
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with suprapubic tube (SPT), compared to urethral catheter (UC) drainage, has been proposed to improve patient comfort and recovery. We sought to compare short-term outcomes for pain and morbidity after RALP with SPT vs UC drainage. Methods: Between August 2012 and 2014, 159 men underwent a RALP and prospectively completed a questionnaire addressing postoperative pain and satisfaction. Group 1 (n = 94) underwent a RALP by one surgeon who placed a UC and removed it between postoperative day (POD) 7 and 10. Group 2 (n = 65) underwent a RALP by a different surgeon who placed an SPT and UC. On POD 1, the UC was removed. On POD 9, the SPT was capped and removed on POD 11 if the patient was voiding adequately. Preoperative and intraoperative data, complications, questionnaires, and patient-reported morbidity, including unplanned telephone calls and emergency department (ED) visits, were compared between groups. Results: Patient characteristics were similar between groups. One week after surgery, the penile pain score was statistically significantly lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (56.9% and 79.8%, respectively, reported minimal-to-moderate pain, p = 0.003). Bladder spasms and overall pain were not significantly higher for Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p > 0.05). When asked "How big a problem has your urine storage device been?," 20.2% of patients in Group 1 reported it as a "moderate-to-big" problem compared to 10.8% in Group 2 (p > 0.05). The number of catheter-related unplanned telephone encounters did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.7), however, although not statistically significant, 4.6% of patients in Group 2 presented to the ED with catheter-related issues (p = 0.07). Conclusion: SPT after RALP was associated with less penile pain compared to UC drainage, and modestly better patient satisfaction. There were no significant differences in bladder spasms, overall pain, and patient-reported morbidity between groups. © Copyright 2016, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2016.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 305
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early Removal of Urethral Catheter with Suprapubic Tube Drainage Versus Urethral Catheter Drainage Alone after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Prasad, Sandip M.
    Large, Michael C.
    Patel, Amit R.
    Famakinwa, Olufenwa
    Galocy, R. Matthew
    Karrison, Theodore
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01) : 89 - 95
  • [2] Suprapubic tube versus urethral catheter drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jian, Zhongyu
    Feng, Shijian
    Chen, Yuntian
    Wei, Xin
    Luo, Deyi
    Li, Hong
    Wang, Kunjie
    BMC UROLOGY, 2018, 18 : 1
  • [3] Suprapubic tube compared with urethral catheter drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Mei-Xuan
    Cheng, Peng
    Yao, Liang
    Li, Hui-Juan
    Xun, Yang-Qin
    Yan, Pei-Jing
    Han, Cai-Wen
    Lu, Cun-Cun
    He, Wen-Bo
    Wang, Meng
    Liu, Rong
    Guo, Tian-Kang
    Yang, Ke-Hu
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 42 (01) : 71 - 80
  • [4] Postoperative patient comfort in suprapubic drainage versus transurethral catheterization following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial
    Harke, Nina
    Godes, Michael
    Habibzada, Jawid
    Urbanova, Katarina
    Wagner, Christian
    Zecha, Henrik
    Addali, Mustapha
    Witt, Jorn H.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (03) : 389 - 394
  • [5] Supra-pubic versus urethral catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: systematic review of current evidence
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Tracey, Andrew
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Micali, Salvatore
    Bianchi, Giampaolo
    Hampton, Lance
    Tewari, Ash K.
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Autorino, Riccardo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) : 1365 - 1372
  • [6] Modification of Technique for Suprapubic Catheter Placement After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Reduces Catheter-associated Complications
    Afzal, Muhammad Zubair
    Tobert, Conrad M.
    Bulica, Emi
    Noyes, Sabrina L.
    Lane, Brian R.
    UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (02) : 401 - 406
  • [7] Impact of Percutaneous Suprapubic Tube Drainage on Patient Discomfort after Radical Prostatectomy
    Krane, Louis Spencer
    Bhandari, Mahendra
    Peabody, James O.
    Menon, Mani
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (02) : 325 - 330
  • [8] Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Sukumar, Shyam
    Diaz, Mireya
    Simone, Andrea
    Kaul, Sanjeev
    Menon, Mani
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (04) : 580 - 585
  • [9] Urodynamic Assessment of Bladder and Urethral Sphincter Function Before and After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Barnoiu, O. S.
    Vozmediano-Chicharro, R.
    Garcia-Galisteo, E.
    Soler-Martinez, J.
    del Rosa-Samaniego, J. M.
    Machuca-Santacruz, J.
    Baena-Gonzalez, V.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2014, 38 (02): : 78 - 83
  • [10] Suprapubic versus transurethral bladder drainage after radical prostatectomy: Impact on patient discomfort
    Orikasa, Seiichi
    Kanbe, Koichi
    Shirai, Shuichi
    Shintaku, Ichiro
    Kurosu, Seiichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (06) : 587 - 590