Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners

被引:8
作者
Lill, Jordan D. [1 ]
Shriver, Mark D. [1 ]
Allen, Keith D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Munroe Meyer Inst Genet & Rehabil, Dept Psychol, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
关键词
Preference assessment; Decision making; Clinical practice; RESPONSE-RESTRICTION ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE-STIMULUS; DEVELOPMENTAL-DISABILITIES; REINFORCER IDENTIFICATION; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; SOCIAL-INTERACTION; CHOICE ASSESSMENT; PROBLEM BEHAVIOR; INDIVIDUALS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A stimulus preference assessment (SPA) is a fundamental tool used by practitioners to predict stimuli that function as reinforcers. The Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) requires that all certified behavior analysts and behavioral technicians be trained in SPA methodology (BACB, 2017). SPA procedures are used by nearly 9 out of 10 behavior analysts in the field (Graff & Karsten, 2012). Over the last 4 decades, there has been a litany of research on SPA procedures. Despite the universality of training, application, and research, discussions on the selection of SPA procedures have been sparse. Two peer-reviewed articles have focused on clinical decision making in the selection of SPA procedures. Karsten et al. (2011) introduced an in situ decision-making model, whereas Virues-Ortega et al. (2014) developed an a priori algorithm based on client and stimuli characteristics. The SPADS addresses the limitations of prior models by considering the effects of stimuli dimensions, client characteristics, relative administration times, and the outcomes agreement between two potentially efficacious, context-specfic SPA procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:1144 / 1156
页数:13
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BCBA TASK LIST, V5th
[2]   On the displacement of leisure items by food during multiple-stimulus preference assessments [J].
Bojak, SL ;
Carr, JE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1999, 32 (04) :515-518
[3]  
Buchmeier AL., 2018, BEHAV ANAL RES PRACT, V18, P103, DOI [10.1037/bar0000085, DOI 10.1037/BAR0000085]
[4]   CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN SINGLE VERSUS DAILY PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES AND REINFORCER EFFICACY UNDER PROGRESSIVE-RATIO SCHEDULES [J].
Call, Nathan A. ;
Trosclair-Lasserre, Nicole M. ;
Findley, Addie J. ;
Reavis, Andrea R. ;
Shillingsburg, M. Alice .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2012, 45 (04) :763-777
[5]   Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature [J].
Cannella, HI ;
O'Reilly, MF ;
Lancioni, GE .
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2005, 26 (01) :1-15
[6]   Further evaluation of the effects of motivating operations on preference assessment outcomes [J].
Chappell, Nick ;
Graff, Richard B. ;
Libby, Myrna E. ;
Ahearn, William H. .
RESEARCH IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS, 2009, 3 (03) :660-669
[7]   Assessing preference for and reinforcing efficacy of components of social interaction in individuals with autism spectrum disorder [J].
Clay, Casey J. ;
Samaha, Andrew L. ;
Bogoev, Bistra K. .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2018, 62 :4-14
[8]   Assessing preference for social interactions [J].
Clay, Casey J. ;
Samaha, Andrew L. ;
Bloom, Sarah E. ;
Bogoev, Bistra K. ;
Boyle, Megan A. .
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2013, 34 (01) :362-371
[9]   Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments [J].
Clevenger, TM ;
Graff, RB .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2005, 38 (04) :543-547
[10]   Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities [J].
Conyers, C ;
Doole, A ;
Vause, T ;
Harapiak, S ;
Yu, DCT ;
Martin, GL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2002, 35 (01) :49-58