Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery

被引:6
作者
Grade, M. [1 ]
Ridwelski, K. [2 ]
Voigt, I. [2 ]
Ghadimi, B. M. [1 ]
Mann, B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Gottingen, Klin Allgemein Viszeral & Kinderchirurg, Robert Koch Str 40, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Klinikum Magdeburg gGmbH, Klin Allgemein & Viszeralchirurg, Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Augusta Kranken Anstalt, Klin Allgemein & Viszeralchirurg, Bochum, Germany
来源
ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE | 2016年 / 141卷 / 02期
关键词
low anterior rectal resection; abdominoperineal rectal excision; robotic surgery; rectal cancer; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; COLORECTAL SURGERY; RESECTION; MULTICENTER; LAPAROSCOPY; DYSFUNCTION; RECURRENCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1055/s-0042-101960
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The oncological outcome of patients with rectal cancer has improved considerably over the past few decades. This is mainly due to the introduction of the surgical concept of total mesorectal excision (TME) and the implementation of multimodal treatment strategies. Additionally, it has recently been demonstrated that the oncological results of open and laparoscopic TME are comparable. For some time there has been an ongoing debate on the potential relevance of robotic assistance systems in visceral surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the operative and perioperative outcomes of patients with rectal or rectosigmoid cancer, who were operated on using the Da Vinci\(R) Surgical System. Patients and Results: We retrospectively analysed the outcomes of 202 consecutive patients, who were operated between September 2010 and November 2015 in three Surgical Centers. The cohort consisted of 136 men and 66 women with a mean BMI of 28. We performed the following procedures: 49 anterior rectal resections, 119 lowanterior rectal resections, and 34 abdominoperineal excisions. Conversion to an open procedure was required in 13 patients. Non-surgical complications (n = 27) occurred in 24 patients (12%) and surgical complications (n = 67) in 62 patients (31%). Most complications were due to abdominal or sacral wound infections (n = 25) and anastomotic leaks (n = 18). The mortality rate within 30 days was 2%. The rate of R0 resections was 95%, with circumferential resection margins being negative in 98% of the patients. The quality of the mesorectal resection was scored as good in 91% of the patients. Conclusions: The Da Vinci (R) Surgical System can be used safely and with a low complication rate for surgical treatment of rectal cancer. While primary evidence suggests that the outcome of robotic-assisted surgery is comparable with open and laparoscopic surgery, its definitive value has to be determined upon publication of the prospective randomized ROLARR trial. The main advantages of the Da Vinci (R) system are its endowristed instruments with multiple degrees of freedom and its optimised visualisation (3D, stable camera platform controlled by the surgeon). Another positive feature is the significant ergonomic advantage for the surgeon.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 169
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence [J].
Aly, E. H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (01) :1-8
[2]   Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II) [J].
Andersson, J. ;
Abis, G. ;
Gellerstedt, M. ;
Angenete, E. ;
Angeras, U. ;
Cuesta, M. A. ;
Jess, P. ;
Rosenberg, J. ;
Bonjer, H. J. ;
Haglind, E. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (10) :1272-1279
[3]   Ergonomics Considerations of Radical Prostatectomy: Physician Perspective of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Techniques [J].
Bagrodia, Aditya ;
Raman, Jay D. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (04) :627-633
[4]   Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcome of a Prospective Comparative Study [J].
Baik, Seung Hyuk ;
Kwon, Hye Youn ;
Kim, Jin Soo ;
Hur, Hyuk ;
Sohn, Seung Kook ;
Cho, Chang Hwan ;
Kim, Hoguen .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (06) :1480-1487
[5]   New Technology and Health Care Costs - The Case of Robot-Assisted Surgery [J].
Barbash, Gabriel I. ;
Glied, Sherry A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (08) :701-704
[6]   A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer [J].
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
Deijen, Charlotte L. ;
Abis, Gabor A. ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. ;
van der Pas, Martijn H. G. M. ;
de lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M. ;
Lacy, Antonio M. ;
Bemelman, Willem A. ;
Andersson, John ;
Angenete, Eva ;
Rosenberg, Jacob ;
Fuerst, Alois ;
Haglind, Eva .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (14) :1324-1332
[7]   An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer [J].
Collinson, Fiona J. ;
Jayne, David G. ;
Pigazzi, Alessio ;
Tsang, Charles ;
Barrie, Jennifer M. ;
Edlin, Richard ;
Garbett, Christopher ;
Guillou, Pierre ;
Holloway, Ivana ;
Howard, Helen ;
Marshall, Helen ;
McCabe, Christopher ;
Pavitt, Sue ;
Quirke, Phil ;
Rivers, Carly S. ;
Brown, Julia M. B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (02) :233-241
[8]   Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer [J].
Emmertsen, K. J. ;
Laurberg, S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (10) :1377-1387
[9]  
Grade M, 2015, J ROBOT SURG
[10]   Standard perioperative management in gastrointestinal surgery [J].
Grade, Marian ;
Quintel, Michael ;
Ghadimi, B. Michael .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 396 (05) :591-606