Combustion kinetic model development using surrogate model similarity method

被引:25
作者
Wang, Jiaxing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Shuang [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Yang, Bin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Combust Energy, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Energy & Power Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Key Lab Thermal Sci & Power Engn, MOE, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sci & Technol China, Natl Synchrotron Radiat Lab, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
combustion kinetic model; model optimisation; surrogate model similarity; HDMR; experimental design; SHOCK-TUBE; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION; EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY; OPTIMIZATION; MECHANISM; HYDROGEN; OXIDATION; IGNITION; METHANOL;
D O I
10.1080/13647830.2018.1454607
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
An ideal combustion kinetic model needs to be validated by different experimental targets over a wide range of temperatures and pressures that represent operating conditions in real engines. However, conditions of laboratory experiments for model validation are often limited by the constraint of experimental techniques. In order to improve model predictions under certain conditions (for example, at a relatively higher pressure), it is often needed to use the experimental data obtained under other conditions. In this work, the surrogate model similarity (SMS) method is proposed to find the experimental conditions or targets for model optimisation under certain conditions where the experiments are hard to be conducted. The similarity coefficient is calculated by the cosine similarity between the characteristic coefficients (vectors) of the High Dimensional Model Representation (HDMR) models for different model predictions. A larger similarity coefficient represents a closer relationship between two model predictions. The experimental data with larger similarity coefficients could be more effective to model uncertainty reduction under the concerned conditions. To demonstrate this method, simulations were conducted for two selected combustion systems with hydrogen or methanol as the fuel. In addition to its strength in available experimental data selection for model optimization, this method can be used to screen out experimental targets with strong constraint effect beforehand, thus providing an effective way to maximise utilisation of experimental resources.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 794
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[31]   Using sensitivity entropy in experimental design for uncertainty minimization of combustion kinetic models [J].
Li, Shuang ;
Tao, Tao ;
Wang, Jiaxing ;
Yang, Bin ;
Law, Chung K. ;
Qi, Fei .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2017, 36 (01) :709-716
[32]   Accelerate global sensitivity analysis using artificial neural network algorithm: Case studies for combustion kinetic model [J].
Li, Shuang ;
Yang, Bin ;
Qi, Fei .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2016, 168 :53-64
[33]   High-level direct-dynamics variational transition state theory calculations including multidimensional tunneling of the thermal rate constants, branching ratios, and kinetic isotope effects of the hydrogen abstraction reactions from methanol by atomic hydrogen [J].
Meana-Paneda, Ruben ;
Truhlar, Donald G. ;
Fernandez-Ramos, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 134 (09)
[34]   Bayesian uncertainty quantification of recent shock tube determinations of the rate coefficient of reaction H+O2 → OH+O [J].
Miki, Kenji ;
Cheung, Sai Hung ;
Prudencio, Ernesto E. ;
Varghese, Philip L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL KINETICS, 2012, 44 (09) :586-597
[35]   Uncertainty quantification in chemical systems [J].
Najm, H. N. ;
Debusschere, B. J. ;
Marzouk, Y. A. ;
Widmer, S. ;
Le Maitre, O. P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2009, 80 (6-7) :789-814
[36]   Uncertainty Quantification and Polynomial Chaos Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics [J].
Najm, Habib N. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2009, 41 :35-52
[37]  
Nguyen H. V., 2010, COSINE SIMILARITY ME
[38]   Development of an Ethanol Combustion Mechanism Based on a Hierarchical Optimization Approach [J].
Olm, Carsten ;
Varga, Tamas ;
Valko, Eva ;
Hartl, Sandra ;
Hasse, Christian ;
Turanyi, Tamas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL KINETICS, 2016, 48 (08) :423-441
[39]   On the assessment of a Bayesian validation methodology for data reduction models relevant to shock tube experiments [J].
Panesi, M. ;
Miki, K. ;
Prudhomme, S. ;
Brandis, A. .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 213 :383-398
[40]   Uncertainty quantification of reaction mechanisms accounting for correlations introduced by rate rules and fitted Arrhenius parameters [J].
Prager, Jens ;
Najm, Habib N. ;
Sargsyan, Khachik ;
Safta, Cosmin ;
Pitz, William J. .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2013, 160 (09) :1583-1593