Pelvic lymph nodes dissection for prostate cancer: Minilap with speculum vs laparoscopy

被引:1
作者
Merlet, B. [1 ]
Ouaki, F. [1 ]
Pires, C. [1 ]
Lecoq, B. [1 ]
Irani, J. [1 ]
Dore, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU La Miletrie, Serv Urol, F-86021 Poitiers, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2010年 / 20卷 / 04期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Pelvic lymph nodes dissection; Mini lap; Laparoscopy; LYMPHADENECTOMY; LYMPHOCELES; STANDARD;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2009.09.041
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction. The pelvic lymph nodes dissection (PLND) is indicated in case of prostate cancer with high risk of ganglionic metastasis. Criteria admitted for indication of PLND are PSA >= 10 ng/ml and/or Gleason score >= 7. Two techniques are available for PLND: minilap and laparoscopy. The purpose of this study was to compare retrospectively minilap and the 2 ways of laparoscopy: intra- and extraperitoneum, in terms of efficiency and complications. Material and method. We reviewed 147 cases of men who's had a PLND in our department between 1992 and 2006. The distribution for every technique was: 34 cases of minilap (23%), 39 cases of intraperitoneum laparoscopy (27%) and 74 cases of extraperitoneum laparoscopy (50%). The mean age was of 67.9 years (52-79). The mean PSA was 19.01 ng/ml (0.3-93) and the average Body Mass Index (BMI) was 26.75 kg m(-2) (17.6-41). Results. Twenty-eight patients (19%) presented a postoperating complication. There was no statistically significant difference according to technique. We did not either find statistical difference concerning the number of analyzed nodes between three groups and the duration of hospitalization. Only the mean operating time and the number of drain of Redon were statistically different. Conclusion. This study did not show any difference in terms of result and complications between the laparoscopy and minilap for the PLND in case of prostate cancer. We think each technique could be proposed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 283
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer
    Briganti, Alberto
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Salonia, Andrea
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Gallina, Andrea
    Da Pozzo, Luigi Filippo
    Roscigno, Marco
    Zanni, Giuseppe
    Valiquette, Luc
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (05) : 1006 - 1013
  • [2] Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer
    Briganti, Alberto
    Blute, Michael L.
    Eastham, James H.
    Graefen, Markus
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Karnes, Jeffrey R.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Studer, Urs E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (06) : 1251 - 1265
  • [3] Delmas V, 2004, PROG UROL, V14, P252
  • [4] FRANCANNET P, 1988, ANN UROL, V22, P369
  • [5] Lymphoceles after laparoscopic pelvic node dissection
    Freid, RM
    Siegel, D
    Smith, AD
    Weiss, GH
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 51 : 131 - 134
  • [6] GIRAUD B, 1987, CHIRURGIE, V113, P495
  • [7] Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: High incidence of lymph node metastasis
    Heidenreich, A
    Varga, Z
    Von Knobloch, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) : 1681 - 1686
  • [8] Herrell SD, 1997, J UROLOGY, V157, P1337
  • [9] Minilaparotomy staging pelvic lymphadenectomy follow-up: a safe alternative to standard and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy
    Idom, CB
    Steiner, MS
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 16 (06) : 396 - 399
  • [10] MR imaging and MR spectroscopy in prostate cancer management
    Katz, Sharyn
    Rosen, Mark
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 44 (05) : 723 - +