How well do CMIP5 climate models reproduce explosive cyclones in the extratropics of the Northern Hemisphere?

被引:41
|
作者
Seiler, C. [1 ]
Zwiers, F. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, Univ House 1,POB 1700 Stn CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
关键词
Explosive cyclones; CMIP5 climate models; Model biases; EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; STORM TRACKS; VARIABILITY; PROJECTIONS; RESOLUTION; ATLANTIC; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00382-015-2642-x
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Extratropical explosive cyclones are rapidly intensifying low pressure systems with severe wind speeds and heavy precipitation, affecting livelihoods and infrastructure primarily in coastal and marine environments. This study evaluates how well the most recent generation of climate models reproduces extratropical explosive cyclones in the Northern Hemisphere for the period 1980-2005. An objective-feature tracking algorithm is used to identify and track cyclones from 25 climate models and three reanalysis products. Model biases are compared to biases in the sea surface temperature (SST) gradient, the polar jet stream, the Eady growth rate, and model resolution. Most models accurately reproduce the spatial distribution of explosive cyclones when compared to reanalysis data (R = 0.94), with high frequencies along the Kuroshio Current and the Gulf Stream. Three quarters of the models however significantly underpredict explosive cyclone frequencies, by a third on average and by two thirds in the worst case. This frequency bias is significantly correlated with jet stream speed in the inter-model spread (R 0.51), which in the Atlantic is correlated with a negative meridional SST gradient (R = -0.56). The importance of the jet stream versus other variables considered in this study also applies to the interannual variability of explosive cyclone frequency. Furthermore, models with fewer explosive cyclones tend to underpredict the corresponding deepening rates (R 0.88). A follow-up study will assess the impacts of climate change on explosive cyclones, and evaluate how model biases presented in this study affect the projections.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1256
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating wind extremes in CMIP5 climate models
    Kumar, Devashish
    Mishra, Vimal
    Ganguly, Auroop R.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2015, 45 (1-2) : 441 - 453
  • [42] The Influences of the Model Configuration on the Simulation of Stratospheric Northern-Hemisphere Polar Vortex in the CMIP5 Models
    Cai, Zelin
    Wei, Ke
    Xu, Luyang
    Lan, Xiaoqing
    Chen, Wen
    Nath, Debashis
    ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2017, 2017
  • [43] Delayed Southern Hemisphere Climate Change Induced by Stratospheric Ozone Recovery, as Projected by the CMIP5 Models
    Barnes, Elizabeth A.
    Barnes, Nicholas W.
    Polvani, Lorenzo M.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (02) : 852 - 867
  • [44] Simulation and Projection of the Southern Hemisphere Annular Mode in CMIP5 Models
    Zheng, Fei
    Li, Jianping
    Clark, Robin T.
    Nnamchi, Hyacinth C.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (24) : 9860 - 9879
  • [45] Fronts and precipitation in CMIP5 models for the austral winter of the Southern Hemisphere
    Blazquez, Josefina
    Solman, Silvina A.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2018, 50 (7-8) : 2705 - 2717
  • [46] Fronts and precipitation in CMIP5 models for the austral winter of the Southern Hemisphere
    Josefina Blázquez
    Silvina A. Solman
    Climate Dynamics, 2018, 50 : 2705 - 2717
  • [47] How Well Do Climate Models Reproduce North Atlantic Subtropical Mode Water?
    Dong, Shenfu
    Kelly, Kathryn A.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 2013, 43 (10) : 2230 - 2244
  • [48] ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    Bellenger, H.
    Guilyardi, E.
    Leloup, J.
    Lengaigne, M.
    Vialard, J.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2014, 42 (7-8) : 1999 - 2018
  • [49] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes
    Chen, Huopo
    Sun, Jianqi
    Lin, Wenqing
    Xu, Huiwen
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (17) : 1415 - 1418
  • [50] ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    H. Bellenger
    E. Guilyardi
    J. Leloup
    M. Lengaigne
    J. Vialard
    Climate Dynamics, 2014, 42 : 1999 - 2018