The role of geopolitical risks on the Turkish economy opportunity or threat

被引:51
作者
Mansour-Ichrakieh, Layal [1 ]
Zeaiter, Hussein [1 ]
机构
[1] Lebanese Amer Univ, Dept Econ, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Financial Stress Index; Geopolitical Risk; Threshold VAR; Currency crisis; Turkey; FINANCIAL STRESS; CONDITIONS INDEX; CURRENCY CRISES; DETERMINANTS; INDICATORS; COUNTRIES; FRAGILITY; SYSTEM; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.najef.2019.101000
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to assess the extent of geopolitical risk (GPR) on the Turkish financial stability. Financial stability is calculated by constructing a New Financial Stress Index (NFSI), which includes for the first time in Turkey, the dollarization rate. Using monthly data from January 2006 to November 2018, we apply Threshold Vector Auto Regression method (Threshold VAR) to evaluate the impact of GPR stemming from Saudi Arabia (regional) and Russia (global) on financial stress in Turkey. This method defines two regimes (high-stress and low-stress) and captures a nonlinearity association between GPR and NFSI. We use the model to run Granger causality tests to study whether the consumer confidence, financial stability and geopolitical risks at the regional and the global levels predict future financial crises in Turkey. Interestingly, our data covers the recent trade spat between Turkey and the US. Our results reveal that: (i) The FSI without the dollarization rate underestimates the severity of financial crises, while the FSI that includes the dollarization rate has detected a turning point dated -December 2013-, where the financial market, or more precisely, the foreign exchange market has become more vulnerable and exposed to future financial crises; (ii) higher GPR in Russia results in higher financial stability in Turkey, while higher GPR in Saudi Arabia results in higher financial vulnerability in Turkey. Consequently, we deduce that GPRs stemming from Saudi Arabia and Russia affect Turkish financial stability differently. Russia appears to be a political and economic competitor for Turkey, while Saudi Arabia is more likely to be dependent geopolitically.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 108 条
[31]   Does financial liberalization spur growth? [J].
Bekaert, G ;
Harvey, CR ;
Lundblad, C .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (01) :3-55
[32]   Predicting currency crises: The indicators approach and an alternative [J].
Berg, A ;
Pattillo, C .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 1999, 18 (04) :561-586
[33]   Aggregate price shocks and financial instability: A historical analysis [J].
Bordo, MD ;
Dueker, MJ ;
Wheelock, DC .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2002, 40 (04) :521-538
[34]  
Brave S.A., 2011, Economic Perspectives, V35, P22, DOI DOI 10.21033/EP-2019-1
[35]  
Caldara D, 2018, INT FINANCE DISCUSSI, V1222
[36]  
Calvo G. A., 2006, W12788 NAT BUR EC RE
[37]  
Camlica F, 2016, TCMB EKONOMI NOTLARI, V16/06
[38]   Responsiveness of monetary policy to financial stress in Turkey [J].
Camlica, Ferhat .
CENTRAL BANK REVIEW, 2016, 16 (04) :143-150
[39]   Financial stress and economic contractions [J].
Cardarelli, Roberto ;
Elekdag, Selim ;
Lall, Subir .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2011, 7 (02) :78-97
[40]  
Celasun O., 1999, POLICY REWORKING P