Predicting chemoradiotherapy response of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using texture features based on intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging

被引:20
|
作者
Qin, Yuhui [1 ]
Yu, Xiaoping [1 ,4 ]
Hou, Jing [1 ]
Hu, Ying [2 ]
Li, Feiping [1 ]
Wen, Lu [1 ]
Lu, Qiang [1 ]
Fu, Yi [3 ]
Liu, Siye [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Xiangya Sch Med, 283 Tongzipo Rd, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Dept Radiotherapy, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Xiangya Sch Med, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Dept Med Serv, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Xiangya Sch Med, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Canc Hosp, 283 Tongzipo Rd, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
chemoradiotherapy; diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; nasopharyngeal neoplasms; radiographic image interpretation; treatment outcome; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY RESPONSE; PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE; HETEROGENEITY; CT; PARAMETERS; MAPS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000011676
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to investigative the utility of gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) texture analysis based on intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) for predicting the early response to chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Baseline IVIM-DWI was performed on 81 patients with NPC receiving chemoradiotherapy in a prospective nested case-control study. The patients were categorized into the residue (n=11) and nonresidue (n=70) groups, according to whether there was local residual lesion or not at the end of chemoradiotherapy. The pretreatment tumor volume and the values of IVIM-DWI parameters (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], D, D, and f) and GLCM features based on IVIM-DWI were compared between the 2 groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were generated to determine significant indicator of treatment response.The nonresidue group had lower tumor volume, ADC, D, Correlat(ADC), Correlat(D), InvDfMom(ADC), InvDfMom(D) and InvDfMom(D) values, together with higher Contrast(D), Contrast(f), SumAverg(ADC), SumAverg(D), and SumAverg(D) values, than the residue group (all P<.05). Based on ROC curve in univariate analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) values for individual GLCM features in the prediction of the treatment response ranged from 0.635 to 0.879, with sensitivities from 54.55% to 100.00% and specificities from 52.86% to 85.71%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated D (P=.026), InvDfMom(ADC) (P=.033) and SumAverg(D) (P=.015) as the independent predictors for identifying NPC without residue, with an AUC value of 0.977, a sensitivity of 90.91% and a specificity of 95.71%.Pretreatment GLCM features based on IVIM-DWI, especially on the diffusion-related maps, may have the potential to predict the early response to chemoradiotherapy for NPC.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for predicting kidney allograft function decline: comparison with clinical parameters
    Wang, Wei
    Yu, Yuanmeng
    Chen, Jinsong
    Zhang, Longjiang
    Li, Xue
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [32] Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for predicting kidney allograft function decline: comparison with clinical parameters
    Wei Wang
    Yuanmeng Yu
    Jinsong Chen
    Longjiang Zhang
    Xue Li
    Insights into Imaging, 15
  • [33] Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant retropharyngeal nodes
    So, Tiffany Y.
    Ai, Qi-Yong H.
    Lam, W. K. Jacky
    Qamar, Sahrish
    Poon, Darren M. C.
    Hui, Edwin P.
    Mo, Frankie K. F.
    Chan, K. C. Allen
    King, Ann D.
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2020, 62 (12) : 1667 - 1676
  • [34] Preliminary Application of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Diagnosing Lung Cancer
    Jin, Xianwen
    Liu, Xianling
    Hou, Yuejiao
    Song, Gesheng
    Zhang, Chengqi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2019, 9 (04) : 776 - 780
  • [35] Differential detection of metastatic and inflammatory lymph nodes using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging
    Guo, Liuji
    Liu, Xiaomin
    Liu, Zhi
    Li, Xiaodan
    Si, Zhiguang
    Qin, Jie
    Mei, Yingjie
    Zhang, Zhongping
    Xu, Yikai
    Wu, Yuankui
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 65 : 62 - 66
  • [36] Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant retropharyngeal nodes
    Tiffany Y. So
    Qi-Yong H. Ai
    W. K. Jacky Lam
    Sahrish Qamar
    Darren M. C. Poon
    Edwin P. Hui
    Frankie K. F. Mo
    K. C. Allen Chan
    Ann D. King
    Neuroradiology, 2020, 62 : 1667 - 1676
  • [37] The value of multiparametric histogram features based on intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) for the differential diagnosis of liver lesions
    Ai, Zhu
    Han, Qijia
    Huang, Zhiwei
    Wu, Jiayan
    Xiang, Zhiming
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (18)
  • [38] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Correlation with Enhancement Degree and Histologic Grade
    Woo, Sungmin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Joo, Ijin
    Han, Joon Koo
    Choi, Byung Ihn
    RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (03) : 758 - 767
  • [39] Differentiating the lung lesions using Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging: a meta-analysis
    Liang, Jianye
    Li, Jing
    Li, Zhipeng
    Meng, Tiebao
    Chen, Jieting
    Ma, Weimei
    Chen, Shen
    Li, Xie
    Wu, Yaopan
    He, Ni
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [40] Predicting Early Response to Chemoradiotherapy for Uterine Cervical Cancer Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging
    Kato, Hiroki
    Esaki, Kae
    Yamaguchi, Takahiro
    Tanaka, Hidekazu
    Kajita, Kimihiro
    Furui, Tatsuro
    Morishige, Ken-ichirou
    Goshima, Satoshi
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 18 (04) : 293 - 298