Effective Selection Indices for Improving Tolerance to Water Stress in Millet Germplasm

被引:8
作者
Vaezi, H. [1 ]
Mohammadi-Nejad, G. [2 ]
Majidi-Heravan, E. [1 ]
Nakhoda, B. [3 ]
Darvish-Kajouri, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Sci & Res Branch, Dept Plant Breeding, Coll Agr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Bahonar Univ Kerman, Res & Technol Inst Plant Prod, Kerman, Iran
[3] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Agr Biotechnol Res Inst Iran, Karaj, Iran
关键词
Foxtail millet; Proso millet; Stress-tolerance; sensitive indices; Water stress; MEMBERSHIP FUNCTION VALUE; DROUGHT RESISTANCE; SETARIA-ITALICA; WHEAT; TRAITS; YIELD; CULTIVARS; GENOTYPES; LINES;
D O I
10.1007/s42106-019-00070-8
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
To evaluate the yield potential of 96 ecotypes including 48 proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) and 48 foxtail millet ecotypes (Setaria italica) along with four check cultivars under well-watered and water stress conditions, a field experiment was carried out in the Agricultural Research Institute, Meybod, Yazd, Iran, during 2013-2014 using an incomplete block design with two replications. Based on the grain and forage yield, tolerance (TOL), stress susceptibility index (SSI), mean productivity (MP), harmonic mean (HM), geometric mean productivity (GMP) and stress tolerance index (STI) as drought tolerance indices were calculated and tolerant genotype selection index (TGSI) was conducted along with factor analysis. Among all the ecotypes and according to all indices, ecotypes S100, P10, S52, P97, S108, P20, S55, S104 and S18 were selected as the most drought-tolerant and grain yield potential. In addition, ecotypes P34, S104, P97, S39, S53, P102, P23, P5, S18, S13, S12, P92, and S3 were tolerant ecotypes with high potential forage yield. The results indicated that the ranking by TGSI was almost similar to the results obtained through the factor analysis. In addition, TGSI has had easier calculations than factor analysis and other methods. Therefore, it is suggested to explore the stress tolerant ecotypes in practical plant breeding.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 105
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Screening drought-tolerant genotypes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using different multivariate methods [J].
Abdolshahi, Roohollah ;
Safarian, Abdorahim ;
Nazari, Maryam ;
Pourseyedi, Shahram ;
Mohamadi-Nejad, Ghasem .
ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (05) :685-704
[2]  
Alexandratos Nikos, 2012, World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working Papers 12-03, P12, DOI DOI 10.22004/AG.ECON.288998
[3]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, WORLD SORGH MILL EC
[5]   Responses to drought induced oxidative stress in five finger millet varieties differing in their geographical distribution [J].
Bhatt D. ;
Negi M. ;
Sharma P. ;
Saxena S.C. ;
Dobriyal A.K. ;
Arora S. .
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2011, 17 (4) :347-353
[6]  
Charu L., 2012, CRITICAL REV BIOTECH
[7]   Evaluation of 14 morphological, yield-related and physiological traits as indicators of drought tolerance in Chinese winter bread wheat revealed by analysis of the membership function value of drought tolerance (MFVD) [J].
Chen, Xiaojie ;
Min, Donghong ;
Yasir, Tauqeer Ahmad ;
Hu, Yin-Gang .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2012, 137 :195-201
[8]   EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR QUANTIFICATION OF DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN WHEAT [J].
CLARKE, JM ;
DEPAUW, RM ;
TOWNLEYSMITH, TF .
CROP SCIENCE, 1992, 32 (03) :723-728
[9]  
Farshadfar E., 2012, EURO J EXP BIO, V2, P1181
[10]  
Fernandez G. C. J., 1992, P INT, P257