We investigate the effect of pressure on both flame structure and soot formation in nitrogen diluted counterflow diffusion flames of ethylene in the 8-32atm pressure range. Capillary-probe gas sampling is performed to resolve spatially the profiles of gaseous species up to three-ring aromatics by GC/MS analysis and multicolor pyrometry is used to quantify the soot volume fraction and dispersion exponent. Self-similarity of flames is preserved by keeping constant mixture fraction and strain rate, so that profiles of concentrations and temperature, normalized with respect to their peak values, are unaffected by changes in pressure, once the axial coordinate is nondimensionalized with respect to the pressure-dependent diffusion length scale. When conditions are chosen so that the overall soot loading is approximately constant and compatible with the diagnostics, it is found that both the soot volume fraction and the profiles of key aromatics in the hightemperature nucleation region are virtually invariant. For it to happen, a twofold increase in pressure must be compensated by a similar to 100 K decrease in peak flame temperature and, therefore, in the temperature across the soot forming region. The implication is that from the perspective of the chemical kinetics of soot formation these two actions counterbalance each other. As pressure increases (and temperature decreases) the peak production rate of the high-temperature soot mechanism decreases and, further downstream, towards the particle stagnation plane, a low-temperature soot mechanism sets in, yielding an increase in soot H/C content. This mechanism is enhanced as the pressure is raised, causing a higher overall soot volume production rate in the 16atm flame and, especially, in the 32atm one. The role of C4/C2 species in the formation of C 6 H 6 increases with increasing pressure and dominates over the recombination of propargyl radical at sufficiently high pressures. A comprehensive database is established for soot models at high pressures of relevance to applications. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute.