Predicting Pilots' Risk-Taking Behavior Through an Implicit Association Test

被引:29
作者
Molesworth, Brett R. C. [1 ]
Chang, Betty [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; ATTITUDES; PREJUDICE; ASYMMETRIES; SALIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0018720809357756
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: The Implicit Association Test (IAT), in combination with a battery of additional psychometric tests, was employed to examine the accuracy with which it predicts pilots' risk-taking behavior. Background: Risk management is an integral part of piloting. Many factors affect pilots' risk management, including individual differences. Therefore, employing a unique methodology from social cognition, the present study examined the influence of attitude, as measured implicitly through the IAT, personality, and flight experience variables on pilots' risk-taking behavior. Method: In addition to a simulated flight on a computer-based flight simulator, 35 pilots completed a battery of psychometric tests. Results: Among the 6 risk perception variables, 10 risk attitude variables, and 2 experience variables, only 2 variables were found to be significantly related with in-flight risk-taking behavior: everyday risk (risk perception) and the IAT effect (attitude). Of these, the IAT effect was the strongest predictor of flight behavior. Conclusion: The results indicate that implicit attitudinal measures, such as the IAT, provide a more accurate forecast of pilot behavior than do the more traditional explicit attitudinal or personality measures. Application: An implicit attitudinal measure can be proactively employed to identify pilots who are potentially more likely to engage in high-risk activities, hence permitting a more strategic approach to pilot training.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 857
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Risk Management
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, DOTFAAAM0217
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, DOTFAAAM9527
[4]   Attributions of implicit prejudice, or "would Jesse Jackson 'fail' the implicit association test?" [J].
Arkes, HR ;
Tetlock, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2004, 15 (04) :257-278
[5]   Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction [J].
Blanton, H ;
Jaccard, J ;
Gonzales, PM ;
Christe, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 42 (02) :192-212
[6]   MOTIVATION TO LEARN AND UNDERSTAND - ON TAKING CHARGE OF ONES OWN LEARNING [J].
BROWN, AL .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1988, 5 (04) :311-321
[7]   Processing fluency as a predictor of salience asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test [J].
Chang, Betty P. I. ;
Mitchell, Chris J. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 62 (10) :2030-2054
[8]   Relationship between selected personality traits and citation for violating pharmacy board regulations [J].
Cocolas, G ;
Sleath, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2000, 57 (05) :456-460
[9]   Novel attitudes can be faked on the Implicit Association Test [J].
De Houwer, Jan ;
Beckers, Tom ;
Moors, Agnes .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 43 (06) :972-978
[10]   AN EXAMINATION OF GENDER DIFFERENCES IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENT RISK PERCEPTION [J].
DEJOY, DM .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1992, 24 (03) :237-246