Body composition in fishes: body size matters

被引:65
作者
Breck, James E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fisheries Res Inst, Michigan Dept Nat Resources, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Proximate body composition; Body size; Allometry; Protein; Lipid; PROXIMATE COMPOSITION; ENERGY CONTENT; ONCORHYNCHUS-NERKA; ATLANTIC SALMON; COHO SALMON; FOOD-INTAKE; TEMPERATURE; GROWTH; AGE; NUTRIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.05.049
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Fish proximate body composition is of great interest in aquaculture because it affects fish appetite, growth and the efficiency of food utilization. Proximate body composition also affects other aspects of fish biology and ecology, including reproduction, survival, and energy value to predators. Two very strong relationships among body components are revealed by taking into account fish body size in terms of water mass. There is a very strong relationship between water mass and protein mass, with the amount of water per unit protein decreasing in larger fish. The strength of this relationship and its presence in a variety of fish species suggest a physiological or biochemical cause. Similarly, there is a very strong relationship between water mass and ash mass, with the amount of water per unit ash decreasing in larger fish. These two strong relationships enable fish body composition to be predicted from wet weight and percent water. Calculated water mass is used to predict mass of protein and ash, then lipid mass is found by subtraction of water, protein, and ash from body mass. Results from this approach suggest that there is virtually no functional relationship between body lipid and body water. Fish energy density can be calculated from proximate composition. These relationships should be useful in studying fish bioenergetics and other aspects of fish growth. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 49
页数:10
相关论文
共 78 条
[71]  
Sogard SM, 2000, J FISH BIOL, V56, P1
[72]  
THOMPSON JM, 1991, T AM FISH SOC, V120, P346, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1991)120<0346:ROSCAL>2.3.CO
[73]  
2
[74]   Modelling the proximate basis of salmonid life-history variation, with application to Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. [J].
Thorpe, JE ;
Mangel, M ;
Metcalfe, NB ;
Huntingford, FA .
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (05) :581-599
[75]   Energy density of anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus L. in the Adriatic Sea [J].
Tirelli, V ;
Borme, D ;
Tulli, F ;
Cigar, M ;
Umani, SF ;
Brandt, SB .
JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2006, 68 (03) :982-989
[76]   Indicators of energetic status in juvenile coho salmon and Chinook salmon [J].
Trudel, M ;
Tucker, S ;
Morris, JFT ;
Higgs, DA ;
Welch, DW .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, 2005, 25 (01) :374-390
[77]   Proximate composition and energy density of some North Pacific forage fishes [J].
Van Pelt, TI ;
Piatt, JF ;
Lance, BK ;
Roby, DD .
COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-MOLECULAR & INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 118 (04) :1393-1398
[78]   BODY COMPOSITION STUDIES ON SUCKLING PIG .I. MOISTURE CHEMICAL FAT TOTAL PROTEIN AND TOTAL ASH IN RELATION TO AGE AND BODY WEIGHT [J].
WOOD, AJ ;
GROVES, TDD .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1965, 45 (01) :8-&