How large is large enough for insects? Forest fragmentation effects at three spatial scales

被引:51
作者
Ribas, CR
Sobrinho, TG
Schoereder, JH [1 ]
Sperber, CF
Lopes-Andrade, C
Soares, SM
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Biol Geral, BR-36570000 Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Biol Anim, Pograma Posgrad Entomol, BR-36570000 Vicosa, MG, Brazil
来源
ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY | 2005年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
ants; conservation; crickets; forest remnants; habitat fragmentation; species richness;
D O I
10.1016/j.actao.2004.08.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Several mechanisms may lead to species loss in fragmented habitats, such as edge and shape effects, loss of habitat and heterogeneity. Ants and crickets were sampled in 18 forest remnants in south-eastern Brazil, to test whether a group of small remnants maintains the same insect species richness as similar sized large remnants, at three spatial scales. We tested hypotheses about alpha and gamma diversity to explain the results. Groups of remnants conserve as many species of ants as a single one. Crickets, however, showed a scale-dependent pattern: at small scales there was no significant or important difference between groups of remnants and a single one, while at the larger scale the group of remnants maintained more species. Alpha diversity (local species richness) was similar in a group of remnants and in a single one, at the three spatial scales, both for ants and crickets. Gamma diversity, however, varied both with taxa (ants and crickets) and spatial scale, which may be linked to insect mobility, remnant isolation, and habitat heterogeneity. Biological characteristics of the organisms involved have to be considered when studying fragmentation effects, as well as spatial scale at which it operates. Mobility of the organisms influences fragmentation effects, and consequently conservation strategies. (C) 2004 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 41
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   How small is too small for small animals? Four terrestrial arthropod species in different-sized remnant woodlands in agricultural Western Australia [J].
Abensperg-Traun, M ;
Smith, GT .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1999, 8 (05) :709-726
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, IDENTIFICATION GUIDE
[4]   Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds in spatially explicit models [J].
Bascompte, J ;
Sole, RV .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 65 (04) :465-473
[5]   Nestedness, biogeographic theory, and the design of nature reserves [J].
Boecklen, WJ .
OECOLOGIA, 1997, 112 (01) :123-142
[6]   Influence of connectivity on demography and dispersal in two contrasting habitats: an experimental approach [J].
Boudjemadi, K ;
Lecomte, J ;
Clobert, J .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1999, 68 (06) :1207-1224
[7]  
Bruner L., 1916, Annals of the Carnegie Museum, V10
[8]   COLONIZING ABILITIES, ISLAND SIZE, AND THE NUMBER OF SPECIES ON ARCHIPELAGOES [J].
COLE, BJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1981, 117 (05) :629-638
[9]  
Colwell RK, 1997, ESTIMATES STAT ESTIM
[10]  
Crawley M.J., 2002, STAT COMPUTING INTRO