A general framework for marker-assisted selection

被引:6
|
作者
Hu, Xin-Sheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
关键词
marker-assisted selection; epistatic effects; mass selection; diallel cross; GCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.tpb.2007.02.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Early simulation studies have showed that the inclusion of epistatic components (especially the additive-by-additive effects) into marker-assisted selection (MAS) can improve selection efficiency for a short-term breeding program. In this study I extend Lande and Thompson's theory to incorporate both additive and non-additive effects into MAS with reference to the mass selection case. Four different indices are analytically examined in terms of the type of genetic components involved in the marker scores: phenotype-, general combining ability (GCA)-, and GCA and reciprocal effects-based marker scores. The phenotype-based marker index is applicable to any population of non-random mating, while the other three indices are applicable to the synthetic population derived from diallel crosses. All these indices may have higher selection efficiencies than the index with solely additive effects-associated markers as long as the detectable transient non-additive effects are present. The improvement in selection efficiency depends on the magnitude of non-additive variances and the proportion of them explained by markers. The index with the phenotype-based marker scores operates on the whole of the additive and non-additive effects, and has the largest selection efficiency. The indices with the GCA-based marker scores operate only on additive and additive-by-additive genetic variation and have relatively small selection efficiencies. Inclusion of the markers from organelle genomes can also increase selection efficiency, depending upon the proportion of the total genetic variation attributable to organelle genomes and the proportion of them explained by organelle genomic markers. Sharing of markers among different marker scores does not facilitate the improvement of selection efficiency. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 542
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Marker-assisted selection
    Plomion, C
    BIOFUTUR, 2000, 2000 (199) : 26 - 27
  • [2] Marker-assisted selection in maize
    Stuber, CW
    ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1997, 8 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [3] Marker-assisted selection and introgression
    Elsen, JM
    PRODUCTIONS ANIMALES, 2000, : 233 - 237
  • [4] Marker-assisted selection in stone fruits
    Testolin, R
    GENETICS AND BREEDING OF TREE FRUITS AND NUTS, 2003, (622): : 163 - 176
  • [5] Marker-Assisted Selection in Tomato Breeding
    Foolad, Majid R.
    Panthee, Dilip R.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 2012, 31 (02) : 93 - 123
  • [6] Marker-assisted selection for quantitative traits
    Schuster, Ivan
    CROP BREEDING AND APPLIED BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 11 : 50 - 55
  • [7] More on the efficiency of marker-assisted selection
    Hospital, F
    Moreau, L
    Lacoudre, F
    Charcosset, A
    Gallais, A
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1997, 95 (08) : 1181 - 1189
  • [8] Marker-assisted selection in apple breeding
    Kellerhals, M
    Gianfranceschi, L
    Seglias, N
    Gessler, C
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE XXV INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS, PT 11: APPLICATIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BREEDING GENE EXPRESSION AND MOLECULAR BREEDING GENOME ANALYSIS, 2000, (521): : 255 - 265
  • [9] More on the efficiency of marker-assisted selection
    Frédéric Hospital
    L. Moreau
    F. Lacoudre
    A. Charcosset
    A. Gallais
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1997, 95 : 1181 - 1189
  • [10] Marker-Assisted Selection of Grape Hybrids
    Likhovskoi, V. V.
    Zlenko, V. A.
    Spotar, G. Yu.
    Klimenko, V. P.
    NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 18 (03) : 458 - 461