Empirical likelihood meta-analysis with publication bias correction under Copas-like selection model

被引:2
作者
Li, Mengke [1 ]
Liu, Yukun [1 ]
Li, Pengfei [2 ]
Qin, Jing [3 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Sch Stat, KLATASDS MOE, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[3] NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
上海市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Copas selection model; Empirical likelihood; Meta-analysis; Publication bias; Trim-and-fill method; ABUNDANCE; INFERENCE; FILL; TRIM;
D O I
10.1007/s10463-021-00793-4
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis is commonly used to synthesize multiple results from individual studies. However, its validation is usually threatened by publication bias and between-study heterogeneity, which can be captured by the Copas selection model. Existing inference methods under this model are all based on conditional likelihood and may not be fully efficient. In this paper, we propose a full likelihood approach to meta-analysis by integrating the conditional likelihood and a marginal semi-parametric empirical likelihood under a Copas-like selection model. We show that the maximum likelihood estimators (MLE) of all the underlying parameters have a jointly normal limiting distribution, and the full likelihood ratio follows an asymptotic central chi-square distribution. Our simulation results indicate that compared with the conditional likelihood method, the proposed MLEs have smaller mean squared errors and the full likelihood ratio confidence intervals have more accurate coverage probabilities. A real data example is analyzed to show the advantages of the full likelihood method over the conditional likelihood method.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 112
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Almalik, 2020, ARXIV200715955
[2]   Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses [J].
Carpenter, James R. ;
Schwarzer, Guido ;
Ruecker, Gerta ;
Kuenstler, Rita .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (06) :624-631
[3]  
Cooper H., 2009, HDB RES SYNTHESIS ME
[4]   A bound for publication bias based on the fraction of unpublished studies [J].
Copas, J ;
Jackson, D .
BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (01) :146-153
[5]   What works?: selectivity models and meta-analysis [J].
Copas, J .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1999, 162 :95-109
[6]  
Copas J, 2000, Biostatistics, V1, P247, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247
[7]   Inference for non-random samples [J].
Chesher, A .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1997, 59 (01) :77-95
[8]   A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews [J].
Copas, JB ;
Shi, JQ .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (04) :251-265
[9]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[10]   A nonparametric "trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (449) :89-98