The Foundation of a Fair Mudarabah Profit Sharing Ratio: A Case Study of Islamic Banks in Indonesia

被引:2
作者
Ryandono, Muhamad Nafik Hadi [1 ]
Kusuma, Kumara Adji [2 ]
Prasetyo, Ari [1 ]
机构
[1] Airlangga Univ, Fac Econ & Business, Islamic Econ Dept, Jl Airlangga 4-6, Surabaya 60115, East Java Provi, Indonesia
[2] Univ Muhamamdiyah Sidoarjo, Fac Business Law & Social Sci, Management Dept, Sidoarjo, Indonesia
来源
JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS | 2021年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
Islamic Economics; Fairness of Profit-Sharing Nisbah; Mudarabah Contract; Islamic Bank; Indonesia;
D O I
10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0329
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research aims to expose the Islamic perspective on the concept of justice on the Mudarabah contract's profit-sharing ratio. In certain verses in Al-Qur'an, Islamic values in Muamalah, the rules dictated by the Qur'an and its practices, and explanations rendered (more commonly known as Sunnah) by the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and Sahabah (the companions of the Prophet Muhammad), and Fiqh Axiom (rules) in Muamalah (Islamic jurisprudence), are used as the instruments of sharia to achieve the study objective. Islamic monetary establishments in Indonesia are still not in full consistency with the Shariah principles, significantly as far as satisfying equity and justice by Islamic banks in mudarabah contract (with clients). The ignominy is the nisbah (ratio) between the capital proprietor and the capital director. There are models or propositions to decide the benefit (profit)-sharing proportion. Nevertheless, none of them explains or specifies the possibility of equity/justice in the profit-sharing ratio. This research utilizes an explorative and subjective methodology that contributes to the philosophical premise of deciding the profit-sharing fairness. The elements of a just ratio for the Mudharabah contract are mutual willingness, the existence of negotiation, and the level of advantages and risks of the labor.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 337
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Al-Faifi S. A., 2014, SUMMARY FIQIH SUNNAH, V2nd
[2]  
Ali A. I., 2015, ALTERNATIVE KIBOR IS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, J RES ISLAM EC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INTRO ISLAMIC FINANC
[5]  
Az-Zarqa M. A., 2012, ALMADKHAL AL FIQH AL
[6]   Analysis of Hierarchical Competition Structure and Pricing Strategy in the Hotel Industry [J].
Baek, Unji ;
Sim, Youngseok ;
Lee, Seul-Ki .
JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2019, 6 (04) :179-187
[7]  
Djazuli, 2010, FIQH PRINCIPLES ISLA
[8]   Why interest-rate cannot benchmark for Islamic financial product pricing? [J].
Ghauri, Shahid Mohammad Khan .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2015, 22 (07) :1417-1428
[9]  
Ghazali A. H, 1994, PROFITS BANKING BENE
[10]   The Hedonic Method in Evaluating Apartment Price: A Case of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam [J].
Ha Minh Nguyen ;
Hung Quoc Phan ;
Tri Van Tran ;
Thang Kiem Viet Tran .
JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2020, 7 (06) :517-524