MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS TO CONTROL Conyza spp. IN PRE-SOYBEAN SOWING APPLICATIONS

被引:0
作者
Zobiole, L. H. S. [1 ]
Krenchinski, F. H. [2 ]
Pereira, G. R. [1 ]
Rampazzo, P. E. [1 ]
Rubin, R. S. [1 ]
Lucio, F. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dow AgroSci Ind Ltda, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
关键词
horseweed control; herbicide; sequential application; weed; GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT; GLYCINE-MAX; CANADENSIS; HERBICIDES; BONARIENSIS; BIOTYPES; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582018360100076
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of different weed management through a burndown application followed by sequential applications of herbicides to control Conyza spp. Thus, four field experiments were conducted, two in the western region of Parana state (E1 and E2), one in Jatai, Goias state (E3) and another one in Ibiruba, Rio Grande do Sul state (E4). Conyza spp. in this area had a height ranging between 25 and 60 cm. Treatments were arranged in a randomized block design with four replications. The primary herbicide treatments were 2,4-D + glyphosate + diclosulam, chlorimuron-ethyl + glyphosate + 2,4-D, and four doses of diclosulam + halauxifen-methyl + glyphosate. These treatments were applied singly or in sequential applications, made 10 days before the application of ammonium glufosinate, paraquat or saflufenacil. In all experiments, results showed efficient (90%) control of treatments containing diclosulam + halauxifen-methyl in combination with glyphosate on day 35 DAA, regardless of sequential applications. Applications of 2,4-D + glyphosate + diclosulam or chlorimuron-ethyl + glyphosate + 2,4-D were not effective against Conyza spp. at E1 and E2 locations, possibly due to the greater weed size (50 to 60 cm) at these sites. However, the same treatments were effective at E3 and E4 locations, where weeds were smaller. Diclosulam + halauxifen-methyl + glyphosate associated with ammonium glufosinate, paraquat or saflufenacil in sequential applications, proved to be an important tool to manage Conyza spp. at different growth stages.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, CONCL PEER REV PEST, DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2015. 4302/pdf
  • [2] Bell JL, 2014, ARYLEX MODE SITE ACT
  • [3] Bressanin F. N., 2014, Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, V13, P68, DOI 10.7824/rbh.v13i1.208
  • [4] Estimate of the period prior to weed interference in soybean (Glycine max), variety coodetec 202, through two-fold checks
    Constantin, J.
    Oliveira, R. S., Jr.
    Cavalieri, S. D.
    Arantes, J. G. Z.
    Alonso, D. G.
    Roso, A. C.
    [J]. PLANTA DANINHA, 2007, 25 (02) : 231 - 237
  • [5] Ellis JM, 2002, WEED TECHNOL, V16, P541, DOI 10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0541:BOSAHI]2.0.CO
  • [6] 2
  • [7] The discovery of Arylex™ active and Rinskor™ active: Two novel auxin herbicides
    Epp, Jeffrey B.
    Alexander, Anita L.
    Balko, Terry W.
    Buysse, Ann M.
    Brewster, William K.
    Bryan, Kristy
    Daeuble, John F.
    Fields, Stephen C.
    Gast, Roger E.
    Green, Renard A.
    Irvine, Nicholas M.
    Lo, William C.
    Lowe, Christian T.
    Renga, James M.
    Richburg, John S.
    Ruiz, James M.
    Satchivi, Norbert M.
    Schmitzer, Paul R.
    Siddall, Thomas L.
    Webster, Jeffery D.
    Weimer, Monte R.
    Whiteker, Gregory T.
    Yerkes, Carla N.
    [J]. BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 24 (03) : 362 - 371
  • [8] Heap I., The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds
  • [9] Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Mississippi
    Koger, CH
    Poston, DH
    Hayes, RM
    Montgomery, RE
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) : 820 - 825
  • [10] Defining Binding Efficiency and Specificity of Auxins for SCFTIR1/AFB-Aux/IAA Co-receptor Complex Formation
    Lee, Sarah
    Sundaram, Shanthy
    Armitage, Lynne
    Evans, John P.
    Hawkes, Tim
    Kepinski, Stefan
    Ferro, Noel
    Napier, Richard M.
    [J]. ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 9 (03) : 673 - 682