Orphan drugs expenditure in the Netherlands in the period 2006-2012

被引:20
作者
Kanters, Tim A. [1 ]
Steenhoek, Adri [1 ]
Hakkaart, Leona [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Inst Med Technol Assessment, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES | 2014年 / 9卷
关键词
Orphan drugs; Uptake; Budget impact; Reimbursement; BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS; RARE DISEASES; EU;
D O I
10.1186/s13023-014-0154-0
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: The relatively low budget impact of orphan drugs is often used as an argument in reimbursement decisions. However, overall, the budget impact of orphan drugs can still be substantial. In this study, we assess the uptake and budget impact of orphan drugs in the Netherlands. Methods: We examined the number of orphan drugs, the number of patients and budget impact of orphan drugs in the Netherlands in the period 2006 to 2012, both for inpatient and outpatient orphan drugs. Budget impact was provided in absolute numbers and relative to total pharmaceutical spending. Results: The number of orphan drugs and patients treated increased substantially over the period studied. Overall, budget impact increased substantially over a period of six years, both in absolute terms (326% increase) as well as relative to total pharmaceutical spending (278% increase). Growth rates decreased over time. In 2012, 17% of available drugs had an individual budget impact of more than (sic)10 million per year. Conclusions: Individual budget impact of orphan drugs is often limited, although exceptions exist. However, in total, the budget impact of orphan drugs is considerable and has grown substantially over the years. This could potentially influence reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Commissioning for rare diseases: view from the frontline
    Burls, A
    Austin, D
    Moore, D
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7523): : 1019 - 1021
  • [2] The increasingly complex fourth hurdle for pharmaceuticals
    Cohen, Joshua
    Stolk, Elly
    Niezen, Maartje
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2007, 25 (09) : 727 - 734
  • [3] College voor zorgverzekeringen, 2013, GIP DAT
  • [4] Denis Alain, 2010, J Med Econ, V13, P295, DOI 10.3111/13696998.2010.491427
  • [5] FarmInform, 2013, MAT TURN DEV BAS EUR
  • [6] Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding?
    Hughes, DA
    Tunnage, B
    Yeo, ST
    [J]. QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 98 (11) : 829 - 836
  • [7] Estimating the budget impact of orphan drugs in Sweden and France 2013-2020
    Hutchings, Adam
    Schey, Carina
    Dutton, Richard
    Achana, Felix
    Antonov, Karolina
    [J]. ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2014, 9
  • [8] Orphan drugs, orphan diseases. The first decade of orphan drug legislation in the EU
    Joppi, Roberta
    Bertele', Vittorio
    Garattini, Silvio
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 69 (04) : 1009 - 1024
  • [9] Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: Report of the ISPOR task force on good research practices - budget impact analysis
    Mauskopf, Josephine A.
    Sullivan, Sean D.
    Annemans, Lieven
    Caro, Jaime
    Mullins, C. Daniel
    Nuijten, Mark
    Orlewska, Ewa
    Watkins, John
    Trueman, Paul
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (05) : 336 - 347
  • [10] Global Spending on Orphan Drugs in France, Germany, the UK, Italy and Spain during 2007
    Orofino, Javier
    Soto, Javier
    Casado, Miguel A.
    Oyagueez, Itziar
    [J]. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2010, 8 (05) : 301 - 315