Can innovation be measured? A framework of how measurement of innovation engages attention in firms

被引:23
作者
Brattstrom, Anna [1 ]
Frishammar, Johan [2 ]
Richtner, Anders [3 ]
Pflueger, Dane [4 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Sten K Johnson Ctr Entrepreneurship, Lund, Sweden
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, Entrepreneurship & Innovat, Lulea, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Sch Econ, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] HEC Paris, Paris, France
关键词
Innovation management; Key performance measurement; Measuring innovation; Attention; Attention based theory; Process model; Exploration and exploitation; Conversational measurement; Directional measurement; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT CONTROL-SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT INNOVATION; ORGANIZATIONS; STRATEGY; DESIGN; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; CAPABILITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many firms manage the innovation process by using metrics. Yet, whether measurement supports or hinders innovation continues to be a topic of debate. To shed new light on this debate, this paper presents a conceptual framework of how measurement engages attention in firms. We draw on attention based theory and conceptualize innovation measurement as an attention-focusing device. We identify two ideal types of measurement practices. i) Directional Measurement: which is based on few and unidirectional metrics and encourages exploitative innovation efforts. ii) Conversational Measurement which is based on multiple and ambiguous metrics and encourages exploration. We extend theory building in the technology and accounting literatures by theorizing the role of metrics and measurement for attention and by discussing the implications of such attentional engagement for innovation performance. In so doing, we engage closely with the managerial task of managing innovation while simplifying its conditions, thereby providing actionable advice.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 75
页数:12
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   THE IMPACT OF MANUFACTURING FLEXIBILITY ON MANAGEMENT CONTROL-SYSTEM DESIGN [J].
ABERNETHY, MA ;
LILLIS, AM .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1995, 20 (04) :241-258
[2]   Management control systems in research and development organizations: The role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls [J].
Abernethy, MA ;
Brownell, P .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1997, 22 (3-4) :233-248
[3]   Innovation management measurement: A review [J].
Adams, R ;
Bessant, J ;
Phelps, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2006, 8 (01) :21-47
[4]   Combining creativity and control: Understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity [J].
Adler, Paul S. ;
Chen, Clara Xiaoling .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2011, 36 (02) :63-85
[5]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[6]   Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain [J].
Ahrens, T ;
Chapman, CS .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2004, 21 (02) :271-301
[7]  
Amabile TM, 1998, HARVARD BUS REV, V76, P76
[8]   Assessing the work environment for creativity [J].
Amabile, TM ;
Conti, R ;
Coon, H ;
Lazenby, J ;
Herron, M .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) :1154-1184
[9]   Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework [J].
Anderson, Neil ;
Potocnik, Kristina ;
Zhou, Jing .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) :1297-1333
[10]  
Anderson S. W., 1998, ACCOUNT HORIZ, V12, P213