A novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for offshore wind turbine selection

被引:16
作者
Ma, Yuanxing [1 ]
Xu, Li [1 ]
Cai, Jingjing [1 ]
Cao, Jing [1 ]
Zhao, Fengfeng [1 ]
Zhang, Jiaying [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Elect Power, Coll Math & Phys, Shanghai 200090, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Offshore wind turbine; MCDM; analytic network process; entropy-weight method; wind turbine selection; offshore wind farm; POWER; OPTIMIZATION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1177/0309524X20973600
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Offshore wind power has been an important force to promote energy transformation. To build an advanced offshore wind farm, wind turbine selection requires the decision maker to explore new relevant criteria and evaluate alternatives with respect to decision criteria with assigning importance weightings to the criteria. In this paper, we devise a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for offshore wind turbine selection by reconstructing analytic network process (ANP) and entropy-weight method (EWM). Based on the assigned weightings for ANP and EWM, the best alternative can be selected. For the decision-making model, five main criteria are specifically subdivided into 22 sub-criteria. The method is then applied to deal with the quantitative and qualitative inputs and the interrelation of criteria as arising from decision-making process. The results show that the proposed method can effectively select the optimal one from four different types of alternative offshore wind turbines.
引用
收藏
页码:1273 / 1295
页数:23
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Investigating the Power-COE trade-off for wind farm layout optimization considering commercial turbine selection and hub height variation [J].
Abdulrahman, Mamdouh ;
Wood, David .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 102 :267-278
[2]   Performance evaluation of wind turbines for energy generation in Niger Delta, Nigeria [J].
Adaramola, Muyiwa S. ;
Oyewola, Olanrewaju M. ;
Ohunakin, Olayinka S. ;
Akinnawonu, Olaolu O. .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2014, 6 :75-85
[3]   Assessment of wind power generation along the coast of Ghana [J].
Adaramola, Muyiwa S. ;
Agelin-Chaab, Martin ;
Paul, Samuel S. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 77 :61-69
[4]   Techno-Economic Assessment of Wind Energy Potential at Three Locations in South Korea Using Long-Term Measured Wind Data [J].
Ali, Sajid ;
Lee, Sang-Moon ;
Jang, Choon-Man .
ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (09)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, QHN 1 000009002 2016, P6
[6]   MULTI-PERSON SELECTION OF THE BEST WIND TURBINE BASED ON THE MULTI-CRITERIA INTEGRATED ADDITIVE-MULTIPLICATIVE UTILITY FUNCTION [J].
Bagocius, Vygantas ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Turskis, Zenonas .
JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 20 (04) :590-599
[7]  
Bencherif M., 2014, Sci. J. Energy Eng, V2, P36, DOI [10.11648/j.sjee.20140204.12, DOI 10.11648/J.SJEE.20140204.12]
[8]   Offshore wind power development in Europe and its comparison with onshore counterpart [J].
Bilgili, Mehmet ;
Yasar, Abdulkadir ;
Simsek, Erdogan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (02) :905-915
[9]  
Chen X., 2018, EC RISK ASSESSMENT O
[10]   Market Suitability and Performance Tradeoffs Offered by Commercial Wind Turbines across Differing Wind Regimes [J].
Chowdhury, Souma ;
Mehmani, Ali ;
Zhang, Jie ;
Messac, Achille .
ENERGIES, 2016, 9 (05)