Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography fusion with pathological staging in rectal cancer

被引:21
|
作者
Kam, M. H. [1 ]
Wong, D. C. [2 ]
Siu, S. [1 ,3 ]
Stevenson, A. R. L. [1 ,3 ]
Lai, J. [4 ]
Phillips, G. E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Wesley Positron Emiss Tomog Ctr, So Xray Clin, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Colorectal Diagnost Brisbane, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Pathol Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
PET; ADENOCARCINOMA; RECURRENT; USPIO;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.6866
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study represents an initial experience with combined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) (MRI-PET fusion) in the primary staging of rectal carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data recorded on patients with rectal cancer was undertaken. Patients requiting long-course radiotherapy were excluded. Chest radiography, abdominal computed tomography and endorectal ultrasonography were performed. In addition, MRI of the pelvis, whole-body FDG PET and MRI-PET fusion were carried out. All patients subsequently underwent anterior resection. Results: Twenty-three patients with rectal carcinoma (15 men), of median age 60 (range 46-75) years, were enrolled. In tumour (T) assessment, AM correctly staged 14 of 22 T2/T3 tumours. In lymph node assessment, MRI-PET fusion had a sensitivity of 44 per cent, with a specificity and positive predictive value of 100 per cent. No additional information was acquired from MRI-PET fusion over MRI plus abdominal computed tomography and chest radiography. Conclusion: MRI-PET fusion adds little to conventional investigations for staging rectal carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 268
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improving Target Definition for Head and Neck Radiotherapy: A Place for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 18-Fluoride Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography?
    Prestwich, R. J. D.
    Sykes, J.
    Carey, B.
    Sen, M.
    Dyker, K. E.
    Scarsbrook, A. F.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 24 (08) : 577 - 589
  • [42] Cardiovascular 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison study
    Jack P. M. Andrews
    Gillian MacNaught
    Alastair J. Moss
    Mhairi K. Doris
    Tania Pawade
    Philip D. Adamson
    Edwin J. R. van Beek
    Christophe Lucatelli
    Martin L. Lassen
    Philip M. Robson
    Zahi A. Fayad
    Jacek Kwiecinski
    Piotr J. Slomka
    Daniel S. Berman
    David E. Newby
    Marc R. Dweck
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021, 28 : 1 - 12
  • [43] Cardiovascular 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison study
    Andrews, Jack P. M.
    MacNaught, Gillian
    Moss, Alastair J.
    Doris, Mhairi K.
    Pawade, Tania
    Adamson, Philip D.
    van Beek, Edwin J. R.
    Lucatelli, Christophe
    Lassen, Martin L.
    Robson, Philip M.
    Fayad, Zahi A.
    Kwiecinski, Jacek
    Slomka, Piotr J.
    Berman, Daniel S.
    Newby, David E.
    Dweck, Marc R.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (05) : 1 - 12
  • [44] Hybrid imaging in dementia: A semi-quantitative (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging approach in clinical practice
    Franceschi, Ana Marija
    Naser-Tavakolian, Kiyon
    Clifton, Michael
    Ahmed, Osama
    Stoffers, Katarina
    Bangiyev, Lev
    Cruciata, Giuseppe
    Clouston, Sean
    Franceschi, Dinko
    WORLD JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 20 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [45] Functional imaging of memory processes in humans: Positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging
    Poeppel, T. D.
    Krause, B. J.
    METHODS, 2008, 44 (04) : 315 - 328
  • [46] Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography, Computed Tomography, and Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Initial Staging of Patients with Esophageal Cancer
    Val J. Lowe
    Fargol Booya
    J. G. Fletcher
    Mark Nathan
    Eric Jensen
    Brian Mullan
    Eric Rohren
    Maurits J. Wiersema
    Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros
    Joseph A. Murray
    Mark S. Allen
    Michael J. Levy
    Jonathan E. Clain
    Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2005, 7 : 422 - 430
  • [47] Comparison of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound in the initial staging of patients with esophageal cancer
    Lowe, VJ
    Booya, F
    Fletcher, JG
    Nathan, M
    Jensen, E
    Mullan, B
    Rohren, E
    Wiersema, MJ
    Vazquez-Sequeiros, E
    Murray, JA
    Allen, MS
    Levy, MJ
    Clain, JE
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 7 (06) : 422 - 430
  • [48] Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics in Predicting Lung Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Tang, Xin
    Liang, Jiangtao
    Xiang, Bolin
    Yuan, Changfeng
    Wang, Luoyu
    Zhu, Bin
    Ge, Xiuhong
    Fang, Min
    Ding, Zhongxiang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [49] Combined application of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in early diagnosis of vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaques
    Xie Lei-xing
    Gai Jing-jing
    Niu Jing-xue
    Wang Juan
    Li Juan
    Liang Chang-zai
    Wang Xiao-xi
    Yin Da-yi
    Liu Jia-jin
    Zhang Xiong-wei
    Cheng Liu-quan
    Wang Yong
    Liu Dan-qing
    Liu Hong-bin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 42 (01) : 213 - 223
  • [50] Comparison of F18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as Markers of Graft Viability in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Garika, Siva Srivastava
    Sharma, Anshul
    Razik, Abdul
    Sharma, Akshima
    Pandey, Ravindra Mohan
    Gamanagatti, Shivanand
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Mittal, Ravi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (01) : 88 - 95