Surface Evaluation of Polishing Techniques for New Resilient CAD/CAM Restorative Materials

被引:60
作者
Fasbinder, Dennis J. [1 ]
Neiva, Gisele F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Cariol Restorat Sci & Endodont, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Cariol Restorat Sci & Endodont, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
ROUGHNESS; PORCELAIN; PERFORMANCE; WEAR;
D O I
10.1111/jerd.12174
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure the surface roughness of milled chairside computer-assisted design/computer assisted machining (CAD/CAM) restorations using several contouring/polishing systems as to their effectiveness for creating a clinically acceptable surface. Materials and Methods: One hundred onlays were milled from monolithic CAD/CAM blocks with an MCXL milling chamber (Sirona Dental) as follows: 30 resin nano-ceramic (Lava Ultimate, 3M ESPE), 30 hybrid ceramic (Enamic, Vita) and 40 leucite-reinforced ceramic (EmpressCAD, Ivoclar). A single group of EmpressCAD onlays was glazed-fired in a porcelain oven (Programat CS2, Ivoclar). Finishing and polishing systems consisted of either an abrasive-polish technique or a brush-polish technique. Roughness values were measured using a three-dimensional measuring laser microscope (OLS4000 LEXT by Olympus). Results: There was a significant difference in the baseline surface roughness of the CAD/CAM materials (p <= 0.05), with the resin nano-ceramic (Lava Ultimate) being smoother than the hybrid ceramic (Enamic), and both being smoother than the leucite-reinforced ceramic (EmpressCAD). All polishing techniques resulted in a smoother surface compared with the baseline surface for the leucite-reinforced ceramic (p <= 0.05), with both techniques resulting in a significantly smoother surface than glazing in a porcelain oven (p <= 0.05). Both polishing techniques resulted in a smoother surface compared with the baseline surface for both the nano-ceramic and hybrid ceramic materials (p <= 0.05). Conclusions: It is possible to create an equally smooth surface for chairside CAD/CAM resilient materials compared with milled ceramics using several finishing and polishing techniques. In general, the polished ceramic surfaces were smoother than the glazed ceramic surfaces.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 66
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   Performance of Different Polishing Techniques for Direct CAD/CAM Ceramic Restorations [J].
Flury, S. ;
Lussi, A. ;
Zimmerli, B. .
OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 35 (04) :470-481
[12]  
Flury S, 2014, J DENT RES, V93
[13]   Wear of ceramic and antagonist -: A systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro [J].
Heintze, S. D. ;
Cavalleri, A. ;
Forjanic, M. ;
Zellweger, G. ;
Rousson, V. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2008, 24 (04) :433-449
[14]  
Jung M, 2002, OPER DENT, V27, P175
[15]  
Kawai K, 2000, J PROSTHET DENT, V83, P664, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70068-0
[16]  
Moermann WH, 2006, J AM DENT ASSOC, V137, p7S
[17]  
Oliveira-Junior Osmir Batista, 2013, Gen Dent, V61, pe4
[18]  
Piddock V, 1991, Int J Prosthodont, V4, P132
[19]   An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: A review of the literature [J].
Sadowsky, Steven Judd .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2006, 96 (06) :433-442
[20]   SURFACE-ROUGHNESS OF 2 POLISHED CERAMIC MATERIALS [J].
SCURRIA, MS ;
POWERS, JM .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1994, 71 (02) :174-177