Field experiments show that acoustic pingers reduce marine mammal bycatch in the California drift gill net fishery

被引:117
作者
Barlow, J [1 ]
Cameron, GA [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, SW Fisheries Sci Ctr, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
关键词
bycatch; fishery; pinger; cetacean; dolphin; pinniped; Delphinus delphis; Zalophus californianus; short-beaked common dolphin; California sea lion;
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01108.x
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
A controlled experiment was carried out in 1996-1997 to determine whether acoustic deterrent devices (pingers) reduce marine mammal bycatch in the California drift gill net fishery for swordfish and sharks. Using Fisher's exact test, bycatch rates with pingers were significantly less for all cetacean species combined (P < 0.001) and for all pinniped species combined (P = 0.003). For species tested separately with this test, bycatch reduction was statistically significant for short-beaked common dolphins (P = 0.001) and California sea lions (P = 0.02). Bycatch reduction is not statistically significant for the other species tested separately, but sample sizes and statistical power were low, and bycatch rates were lower in pingered nets for six of the eight other cetacean and pinniped species. A log-linear model relating the mean rate of entanglement to the number of pingers deployed was fit to the data for three groups: short-beaked common dolphins, other cetaceans, and pinnipeds. For a net with 40 pingers, the models predict approximately a 12-fold decrease in entanglement for short-beaked common dolphins, a 4-fold decrease for other cetaceans, and a 3-fold decrease for pinnipeds. No other variables were found that could explain this effect. The pinger experiment ended when regulations were enacted to make pingers mandatory in this fishery.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 283
页数:19
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Anderson R. C, 2000, THESIS U SAN DIEGO S
  • [2] Reactions of harbor porpoises Phocoena phocoena and herring Clupea harengus to acoustic alarms
    Culik, BM
    Koschinski, S
    Tregenza, N
    Ellis, GM
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2001, 211 : 255 - 260
  • [3] Dawson Stephen M., 1994, Reports of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue, V15, P573
  • [4] Gearin Patrick J., 2000, Journal of Cetacean Research and Management, V2, P1
  • [5] Hatakeyama Yoshimi, 1994, Reports of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue, V15, P549
  • [6] Acoustic methods of reducing or eliminating marine mammal-fishery interactions: Do they work?
    Jefferson, TA
    Curry, BE
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 1996, 31 (01) : 41 - 70
  • [7] Julian F, 1998, FISH B-NOAA, V96, P271
  • [8] Kastelein R.A., 1995, P91
  • [9] The effects of acoustic alarms on the behavior of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in a floating pen
    Kastelein, RA
    Rippe, HT
    Vaughan, N
    Schooneman, NM
    Verboom, WC
    De Haan, D
    [J]. MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, 2000, 16 (01) : 46 - 64
  • [10] Acoustic alarms reduce porpoise morality
    Kraus, SD
    Read, AJ
    Solow, A
    Baldwin, K
    Spradlin, T
    Anderson, E
    Williamson, J
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 388 (6642) : 525 - 525