Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region

被引:9
|
作者
van Leeuwen, B. J. [1 ]
Dijkstra, P. U. [2 ,3 ]
Dieters, J. A. [1 ]
Verbeek, H. P. J. [1 ]
Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Ren, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthodont, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Rehabil, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Med Fac, Freiburgstr 7, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Indonesia, Fac Dent, Campus Salemba,Jalan Salemba Raya 4, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
关键词
Cone-beam computed tomography; Dehiscence; Fenestration; Accuracy; Reliability; ORTHODONTIC TOOTH MOVEMENT; ALVEOLAR BONE DEHISCENCES; MANDIBULAR INCISORS; ACCURACY; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-022-04521-x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aims to assess whether different voxel sizes in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) affected surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the mandibular anterior buccal region. Materials and methods Nineteen dry human mandibles were scanned with a surface scanner (SS). Wax was attached to the mandibles as a soft tissue equivalent. Three-dimensional digital models were generated with a CBCT unit, with voxel sizes of 0.200 mm (VS200), 0.400 mm (VS400), and 0.600 mm (VS600). The buccal surface areas of the six anterior teeth were measured (in mm(2)) to evaluate areas of dehiscences and fenestrations. Differences between the CBCT and SS measurements were determined in a linear mixed model analysis. Results The mean surface area per tooth was 88.3 +/- 24.0 mm(2), with the SS, and 94.6 +/- 26.5 (VS200), 95.1 +/- 27.3 (VS400), and 96.0 +/- 26.5 (VS600), with CBCT scans. Larger surface areas resulted in larger differences between CBCT and SS measurements (- 0.1 beta, SE = 0.02, p < 0.001). Deviations from SS measurements were larger with VS600, compared to VS200 (1.3 beta, SE = 0.05, P = 0.009). Fenestrations were undetectable with CBCT. Conclusions CBCT imaging magnified the surface area of dehiscences in the anterior buccal region of the mandible by 7 to 9%. The larger the voxel size, the larger the deviation from SS measurements. Fenestrations were not detectable with CBCT.
引用
收藏
页码:5663 / 5672
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Voxel Sizes in the Detection of Chemically Induced External Root Resorptions
    Kolsuz, Mehmet Eray
    Eren, Hakan
    Celikten, Berkan
    Evli, Perihan Dalgali
    Kocasarac, Husniye Demirturk
    Orhan, Kaan
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2022, 28
  • [32] Influence of voxel size on the diagnostic ability of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate simulated root perforations
    Venskutonis, Tadas
    Juodzbalys, Gintaras
    Nackaerts, Olivia
    Mickeviciene, Lina
    ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 29 (02) : 151 - 159
  • [33] Influence of voxel size on the diagnostic ability of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate simulated root perforations
    Tadas Venskutonis
    Gintaras Juodzbalys
    Olivia Nackaerts
    Lina Mickevicienė
    Oral Radiology, 2013, 29 : 151 - 159
  • [34] Reliability assessment of craniofacial and airway measurements: a comparative study between multidetector computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography
    Sun, Jui-Sheng
    Hung, Min-Chih
    Hsieh, Chi-Yeh
    Lin, Shih-Ying
    Tai, Han-Cheng
    Chang, Jenny Zwei-Chieng
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2025, 95 (01) : 57 - 77
  • [35] Optimizing voxel-wise dose calculations in cone-beam computed tomography
    Kim, Jinwoo
    Yun, Jonghee
    Ha, Seungwoo
    Youn, Hanbean
    Jeon, Hosang
    Kim, Ho Kyung
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 10948
  • [36] Cone-beam computed tomography and microtomography for alveolar bone measurements
    Nathália Ferrare
    André Ferreira Leite
    Hugo César Pinto Marques Caracas
    Ricardo Bentes de Azevedo
    Nilce Santos de Melo
    Paulo Tadeu de Souza Figueiredo
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2013, 35 : 495 - 502
  • [37] Accuracy of Presurgical Limited Field of View Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Predicting Intraoperative Buccal Cortical Bone
    Mayo, Chester V., Jr.
    Replogle, Karan J.
    Marshall, J. Gordon
    Best, Al M.
    Sehgal, Harjit Singh
    Melo, Saulo L. Sousa
    Sedgley, Christine M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2020, 46 (02) : 169 - 177
  • [38] Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images
    Sun, Zongyang
    Smith, Tharon
    Kortam, Sahira
    Kim, Do-Gyoon
    Tee, Boon Ching
    Fieldse, Henry
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (02) : e117 - e127
  • [39] Analysis of alveolar ridge width in an area of central lower incisor using cone-beam computed tomography in vivo
    Dominiak, Marzena
    Hnitecka, Sylwia
    Olchowy, Cyprian
    Olchowy, Anna
    Gedrange, Tomasz
    ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2021, 236
  • [40] Cone-beam computed tomography airway measurements: Can we trust them?
    Obelenis Ryan, Daniel Patrick
    Bianchi, Jonas
    Ignacio, Jaqueline
    Wolford, Larry Miller
    Goncalves, Joao Roberto
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2019, 156 (01) : 53 - 60