Diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection by analyzing whole blood mRNA expression of lymphocyte marker molecules

被引:29
作者
Alakulppi, Noora S.
Kyllonen, Lauri E.
Partanen, Jukka
Salmela, Kaija T.
Laine, Jarmo T.
机构
[1] Finnish Red Cross Blood Serv, Res & Dev, FI-00310 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Renal Transplant Unit, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
kidney transplantation; acute rejection; whole blood; mRNA expression; LIGAND GENE-EXPRESSION; REAL-TIME PCR; GRANZYME-B; QUANTITATIVE DETECTION; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; TRANSPLANT REJECTION; MONONUCLEAR-CELLS; PERFORIN; RECIPIENTS; CYTOKINE;
D O I
10.1097/01.tp.0000258726.13363.ab
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Currently, the diagnosis of acute rejection after kidney transplantation is based on a kidney biopsy taken after clinical rejection suspicion. A robust, noninvasive diagnostic method would allow easier and more frequent monitoring of the patient and the graft. Potentially, a straightforward method would be the analysis of lymphocyte marker molecule expression from whole blood samples. Methods. Whole blood samples were collected prospectively in a single kidney transplantation center from 50 adult kidney recipients transplanted between 2001 and 2005. The mRNA expression of granzyme B, perforin, FasL, granulysin, CD154, ICOS, CTLA4 and PD-1 were analyzed with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results. The expression of ICOS and CD154 were significantly lower in rejection patients than in control patients (P < 0.001). Both genes gave statistically significant area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC; 0.87,0.88) with 84% sensitivity and 100% specificity for CD154 and 76% and 86% for ICOS, respectively. In paired rejection and postrejection therapy samples, the expression of both genes significantly increased during rejection therapy (P < 0.001). When rejection patients were compared to patients biopsied because of other reasons of graft dysfunction, both CD 154 and ICOS were lower in rejection patients but only CD154 was statistically significant (P=0.028, AUC=0.740, sensitivity 52%, specificity 90%). The other studied genes gave no consistent statistically significant results. Conclusions. The whole blood gene expression quantities of costimulatory molecules CD154 and ICOS reasonably robustly differentiated rejection patients from control patients. The clinical use of the analysis is limited by poor capability to differentiate patients with rejection from patients with other causes of graft dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 798
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Molecular signatures of urinary cells distinguish acute rejection of renal allografts from urinary tract infection
    Dadhania, D
    Muthukumar, T
    Ding, RC
    Li, BG
    Hartono, C
    Serur, D
    Seshan, SV
    Sharma, VK
    Kapur, S
    Suthanthiran, M
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (10) : 1752 - 1754
  • [2] Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR
    Dheda, K
    Huggett, JF
    Bustin, SA
    Johnson, MA
    Rook, G
    Zumla, A
    [J]. BIOTECHNIQUES, 2004, 37 (01) : 112 - +
  • [3] Cytokine and cytotoxic molecule gene expression determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the diagnosis of acute renal rejection
    Dugré, FJ
    Gaudreau, S
    Belles-Isles, M
    Houde, I
    Roy, R
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (07) : 1074 - 1080
  • [4] Quantitative detection of changes in cytokine gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells correlates with and precedes acute rejection in renal transplant recipients
    Gibbs, PJ
    Tan, LC
    Sadek, SA
    Howell, WM
    [J]. TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 14 (02) : 99 - 108
  • [5] Perforin, Granzyme B, and Fas Ligand for molecular diagnosis of acute renal-allograft rejection: Analyses on serial biopsies suggest methodological issues
    Graziotto, R
    Del Prete, D
    Rigotti, P
    Anglani, F
    Baldan, N
    Furian, L
    Valente, M
    Antonello, A
    Marchini, F
    D'Angelo, A
    Gambaro, G
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 81 (08) : 1125 - 1132
  • [6] Lies, damn lies, and statistics: The perils of the P value
    Halloran, PF
    Reeve, J
    Kaplan, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (01) : 10 - 11
  • [7] Noninvasive diagnosis of acute rejection of solid organ transplants
    Hartono, C
    Dadhania, D
    Suthanthiran, M
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK, 2004, 9 : 145 - 153
  • [8] Functionally significant renal allograft rejection is defined by transcriptional criteria
    Hoffmann, SC
    Hale, DA
    Kleiner, DE
    Mannon, RB
    Kampen, RL
    Jacobson, LM
    Cendales, LC
    Swanson, SJ
    Becker, BN
    Kirk, AD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (03) : 573 - 581
  • [9] Immune profiling: Molecular monitoring in renal transplantation
    Hoffmann, SC
    Pearl, JP
    Blair, PJ
    Kirk, AD
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK, 2003, 8 : E444 - E462
  • [10] Chronic renal allograft rejection: Pathophysiologic considerations
    Joosten, SA
    Sijpkens, YWJ
    van Kooten, C
    Paul, LC
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 68 (01) : 1 - 13