Development and validation of the Chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (C-PPRS)

被引:1
|
作者
Zhou, Xinyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cai, Yaochun [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Wanyi [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Chen, Qishan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] South China Normal Univ, Minist EduC, Philosophy & Social Sci Lab Reading & Dev Childre, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
[2] South China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, McGovern Inst Brain Res, State Key Lab Cognit Neurosci & Learning & IDG, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Inst Educ Psychol & Sch Counseling, Dept Educ, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Perceived partner responsiveness; Scale development; Chinese version; Validity; Reliability; INTIMACY;
D O I
10.1186/s40359-022-00865-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background Perceived partner responsiveness (PPR) refers to the belief that the relational partner knows and is sensitive and supportive. Instead of translating the English version of the Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (PPRS) into Chinese, this study aimed to construct and analyze the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (C-PPRS). On the one hand, some words in the original scale are inappropriate for the Chinese due to cultural differences. On the other hand, we intended the scale to apply just to persons in romantic relationships, not to friends or roommates. Method We conducted two studies. In the first study, 441 participants who completed the C-PPRS were randomly divided into two samples for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was assessed in a group of 224 participants who completed the C-PPRS and the Quality of Relationship Index in the second study. Results The results indicated that the four-factor model (understanding, intimacy, acceptance, and trust) was a feasible representation of the C-PPRS factor structure (chi(2)/df = 2.27, CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.08, SRMR = 0.05) and had robust internal consistency reliability (alpha = 0.90) and concurrent validity (moderately correlated with the Quality of Relationship Index, r = 0.66, p < 0.001). Conclusion PPR is a concept to understand the psychological manifestations of a person who believes that his or her partner is concerned with core characteristics of the self. The C-PPRS has good psychometric characteristics to evaluate such manifestations and can be applied to future intimacy research.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of perceived physical fatigability using the simplified-Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale
    Hu, Yixin
    Zhang, Hangming
    Xu, Weihao
    Zhao, Ming
    Liu, Juan
    Wu, Linna
    Zou, Lin
    Zuo, Jing
    Liu, Yunxia
    Fan, Li
    Bair, Woei-Nan
    Qiao, Yujia
    Glynn, Nancy W.
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [22] Validation of the Chinese Version of the Multidimensional Workaholism Scale
    Xu, Yan
    Li, Chaoping
    JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 2021, 29 (04) : 608 - 623
  • [23] Validation of the Chinese version of the Smartphone Distraction Scale
    Guo, Zhanpeng
    Liu, Kun
    Liang, Chunguang
    Li, Dan
    Lou, Jinxiang
    Deng, Yu
    Huang, Mina
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (11)
  • [24] Validation of a Chinese version of the Epworth sleepiness scale
    Ning-Hung Chen
    Murray W. Johns
    Hseuh-Yu Li
    Chia-Chen Chu
    Shu-Cheng Liang
    Yu-Hsiang Shu
    Ming-Lung Chuang
    Pa-Chun Wang
    Quality of Life Research, 2002, 11 : 817 - 821
  • [25] Confirmation and Validation of a Chinese version of the Equanimity Scale
    Xiao, Qianguo
    Xu, Yingjie
    Hu, Xiaomei
    MINDFULNESS, 2025, 16 (01) : 289 - 299
  • [26] Validation of a Chinese version of the Epworth sleepiness scale
    Chen, NH
    Johns, MW
    Li, HY
    Chu, CC
    Liang, SC
    Shu, YH
    Chuang, ML
    Wang, PC
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (08) : 817 - 821
  • [27] Validation of the Chinese Version of the Procrastination at Work Scale
    Wang, Jiayan
    Li, Chaoping
    Meng, Xue
    Liu, Doudou
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [28] Validation of the Chinese Version of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy
    Wu, Yuanxia
    Huang, Kailing
    Wen, Shirui
    Xiao, Bo
    Feng, Li
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [29] Validation of the Chinese Version of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS-C)
    Tian P. S. Oei
    James Lin
    Namrata Raylu
    Journal of Gambling Studies, 2007, 23 : 309 - 322
  • [30] Validation of the Chinese Version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID-C) Scale
    Huang, Min-Feng
    Courtney, Mary
    Edwards, Helen
    McDowell, Jan
    DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (01) : 38 - 40