Development and validation of the Chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (C-PPRS)

被引:1
|
作者
Zhou, Xinyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cai, Yaochun [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Wanyi [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Chen, Qishan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] South China Normal Univ, Minist EduC, Philosophy & Social Sci Lab Reading & Dev Childre, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
[2] South China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, McGovern Inst Brain Res, State Key Lab Cognit Neurosci & Learning & IDG, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Inst Educ Psychol & Sch Counseling, Dept Educ, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Perceived partner responsiveness; Scale development; Chinese version; Validity; Reliability; INTIMACY;
D O I
10.1186/s40359-022-00865-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background Perceived partner responsiveness (PPR) refers to the belief that the relational partner knows and is sensitive and supportive. Instead of translating the English version of the Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (PPRS) into Chinese, this study aimed to construct and analyze the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (C-PPRS). On the one hand, some words in the original scale are inappropriate for the Chinese due to cultural differences. On the other hand, we intended the scale to apply just to persons in romantic relationships, not to friends or roommates. Method We conducted two studies. In the first study, 441 participants who completed the C-PPRS were randomly divided into two samples for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was assessed in a group of 224 participants who completed the C-PPRS and the Quality of Relationship Index in the second study. Results The results indicated that the four-factor model (understanding, intimacy, acceptance, and trust) was a feasible representation of the C-PPRS factor structure (chi(2)/df = 2.27, CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.08, SRMR = 0.05) and had robust internal consistency reliability (alpha = 0.90) and concurrent validity (moderately correlated with the Quality of Relationship Index, r = 0.66, p < 0.001). Conclusion PPR is a concept to understand the psychological manifestations of a person who believes that his or her partner is concerned with core characteristics of the self. The C-PPRS has good psychometric characteristics to evaluate such manifestations and can be applied to future intimacy research.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and validation of the Chinese version of the perceived partner responsiveness scale (C-PPRS)
    Xinyi Zhou
    Yaochun Cai
    Wanyi Huang
    Qishan Chen
    BMC Psychology, 10
  • [2] Toward an Optimized Measure of Perceived Partner Responsiveness: Development and Validation of the Perceived Responsiveness and Insensitivity Scale
    Crasta, Dev
    Rogge, Ronald D.
    Maniaci, Michael R.
    Reis, Harry T.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2021, 33 (04) : 338 - 355
  • [3] Validation of a Chinese version of the Perceived Coolness Scale among Chinese college students
    Liu, Lin
    Li, Jian
    Wu, Jinnan
    Zhu, Tingting
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2021, 49 (01):
  • [4] Development and Validation of the Scale of Intimate Partner Violence: Perpetrator Version
    Paiva, Tamyres Tomaz
    Pimentel, Carlos Eduardo
    Lima, Kaline da Silva
    Mariano, Tailson Evangelista
    Santos, Isabella Leandra Silva
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE DIAGNOSTICO Y EVALUACION-E AVALIACAO PSICOLOGICA, 2023, 3 (69): : 63 - 75
  • [5] The validation and application of the Chinese version of perceived nursing work environment scale
    Zhao, Peng
    Chen, Fen Ju
    Jia, Xiao Hui
    Lv, Hui
    Cheng, Piao Piao
    Zhang, Li Ping
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2013, 22 (13-14) : 1827 - 1832
  • [6] Development and Validation of the Chinese Version of The Masturbation Beliefs Scale
    Ren, Zhengjia
    Liu, Yanhong
    Deng, Jianjun
    SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [7] VALIDATION OF PERCEIVED MENTAL FATIGABILITY USING THE CHINESE VERSION OF THE PITTSBURGH FATIGABILITY SCALE
    Hu, Yixin
    Zhang, Hangming
    Xu, Weihao
    Wang, Siyue
    Bair, Woei-Nan
    Fan, Li
    Qiao, Yujia
    Glynn, Nancy W.
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2021, 5 : 532 - 533
  • [8] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE EMPATHY SCALE IN PATIENT CARE: CHINESE VERSION
    Wang, Ya-huei
    Liao, Hung-Chang
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2017, 45 (08): : 1271 - 1280
  • [9] Development and validation of a Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International
    Kwan, Marcella M. S.
    Tsang, William W. N.
    Close, Jacqueline C. T.
    Lord, Stephen R.
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2013, 56 (01) : 169 - 174
  • [10] VALIDATION OF THE GERMAN VERSION OF THE PERCEIVED COHESION SCALE
    Lieb, Marietta
    Adler, Werner
    Herold, Regina
    Erim, Yesim
    Morawa, Eva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2024, 37 (04) : 421 - 432