Failure mode and effects analysis based on a novel fuzzy evidential method

被引:177
作者
Jiang, Wen [1 ]
Xie, Chunhe [1 ]
Zhuang, Miaoyan [1 ]
Tang, Yongchuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Elect & Informat, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Failure mode and effects analysis; Fuzzy evidential method; Reliability analysis; Uncertainty; DempsterShafer evidence theory; RISK-EVALUATION; REASONING APPROACH; DECISION-MAKING; PRIORITIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; LOGIC;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.008
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) has been widely applied to examine potential failures in systems, designs, and products. The risk priority number (RPN) is the key criteria to determine the risk priorities of the failure modes. Traditionally, the determination of RPN is based on the risk factors like occurrence (O), severity (S) and detection (D), which require to be precisely evaluated. However, this method has many irrationalities and needs to be improved for more applications. To overcome the shortcomings of the traditional FMEA and better model and process uncertainties, we propose a FMEA model based on a novel fuzzy evidential method. The risks of the risk factors are evaluated by fuzzy membership degree. As a result, a comprehensive way to rank the risk of failure modes is proposed by fusing the feature information of O, S and D with DempsterShafer (DS) evidence theory. The advantages of the proposed method are that it can not only cover the diversity and uncertainty of the risk assessment, but also improve the reliability of the RPN by data fusion. To validate the proposed method, a case study of a micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) is performed. The experimental results show that this method is reasonable and effective for real applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 683
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Fuzzy Risk Analysis for a Production System Based on the Nagel Point of a Triangle [J].
Akyar, Handan .
MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016
[2]  
Ali T., 2012, International Journal of Computer Applications, P46
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1966, ANN MATH STAT, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-44792-4-3
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1976, DEMPSTERS RULE COMBI, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTV10VM1QB.7
[5]  
[Anonymous], IEEE T RELIAB
[6]   Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation [J].
Aven, Terje .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 253 (01) :1-13
[7]   FUZZY-LOGIC PRIORITIZATION OF FAILURES IN A SYSTEM FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS [J].
BOWLES, JB ;
PELAEZ, CE .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1995, 50 (02) :203-213
[8]   Risk prioritization in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis using interval type-2 fuzzy sets [J].
Bozdag, Erhan ;
Asan, Umut ;
Soyer, Ayberk ;
Serdarasan, Seyda .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (08) :4000-4015
[9]   Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process in an emergency department [J].
Chanamool, Nalinee ;
Naenna, Thanakorn .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 43 :441-453
[10]   Evaluate the orderings of risk for failure problems using a more general RPN methodology [J].
Chang, Kuei-Hu .
MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2009, 49 (12) :1586-1596