Systematic review:: Do we need a new gastro-oesophageal reflux disease questionnaire?

被引:12
作者
Stanghellini, V.
Armstrong, D.
Moennikes, H.
Bardhan, K. D.
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Internal Med & Gastroenterol, S Orsola M Malpighi Hosp, IT-40138 Bologna, Italy
[2] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Humboldt Univ, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Charite, Berlin, Germany
[4] Dist Gen Hosp, Rotherham, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1159/000101077
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in Western countries. Because the majority of patients do not present with endoscopic abnormalities, the assessment of the symptom severity and quality of life, and their response to treatment, has become increasingly important. Self-assessed symptom questionnaires are now key instruments in clinical trials. Aim: To evaluate the validity of available GERD measurement tools. Methods: An ideal GERD symptom assessment instrument, suitable as a primary end-point for clinical trials, should possess the following characteristics: (i) be sensitive in patients with GERD; (ii) cover the frequency and intensity of typical and atypical GERD symptoms; (iii) be multidimensional (cover all symptom dimensions); (iv) have proven psychometric properties (validity, reliability and responsiveness); (v) be practical and economical; (vi) be self-assessed; (vii) use 'word pictures' which are easy to understand for patients; (viii) respond rapidly to changes (responsiveness over short time intervals); (ix) be used daily to assess changes during and after therapy; and (x) be valid in different languages for international use. Results: A literature review revealed five scales that met some of the above characteristics, but did not fulfil all criteria. Conclusion: There is a need for a new evaluative tool for the assessment of GERD symptoms and their response to therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 16
页数:14
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness of a disease-specific symptom questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
Allen, CJ ;
Parameswaran, K ;
Belda, J ;
Anvari, M .
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2000, 13 (04) :265-270
[2]  
ANDERSEN LI, 1987, ACTA MED SCAND, V221, P171
[3]  
Armstrong D, 2001, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V96, P2849
[4]   ACID GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX AND SYMPTOM OCCURRENCE - ANALYSIS OF SOME FACTORS INFLUENCING THEIR ASSOCIATION [J].
BALDI, F ;
FERRARINI, F ;
LONGANESI, A ;
RAGAZZINI, M ;
BARBARA, L .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1989, 34 (12) :1890-1893
[5]   Quality of life assessment after laparoscopic and open fundoplications - Results of a prospective, clinical study [J].
Blomqvist, K ;
Lonroth, H ;
Dalenback, J ;
Ruth, M ;
Wiklund, I ;
Lundell, L .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 31 (11) :1052-1058
[6]   Endoscopy-negative reflux disease [J].
Carlsson, R ;
Holloway, RH .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 14 (05) :827-837
[7]  
Carlsson R, 1998, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V33, P1023
[8]  
COLIN R, 1999, GASTROENTEROL CLIN B, V23, P537
[9]   Development of a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire for individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease - A validation study [J].
Colwell, HH ;
Mathias, SD ;
Pasta, DJ ;
Henning, JM ;
Hunt, RH .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1999, 44 (07) :1376-1383
[10]   Measuring symptom distress and health-related quality of life in clinical trials of gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: Further validation of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS) [J].
Damiano, A ;
Handley, K ;
Adler, E ;
Siddique, R ;
Bhattacharyja, A .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2002, 47 (07) :1530-1537