Evaluating Bifactor Models: Calculating and Interpreting Statistical Indices

被引:1055
作者
Rodriguez, Anthony [1 ]
Reise, Steven P. [1 ]
Haviland, Mark G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, 1285 Franz Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Dept Psychiat, Loma Linda, CA 92350 USA
关键词
bifactor; omega; reliability; explained common variance; measurement; factor determinacy; MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANXIETY SCALE; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; CHILDREN MASC; RELIABILITY; DIMENSIONALITY; FIT; VARIABILITY; HYPOTHESIS; PARCELS;
D O I
10.1037/met0000045
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Bifactor measurement models are increasingly being applied to personality and psychopathology measures (Reise, 2012). In this work, authors generally have emphasized model fit, and their typical conclusion is that a bifactor model provides a superior fit relative to alternative subordinate models. Often unexplored, however, are important statistical indices that can substantially improve the psychometric analysis of a measure. We provide a review of the particularly valuable statistical indices one can derive from bifactor models. They include omega reliability coefficients, factor determinacy, construct reliability, explained common variance, and percentage of uncontaminated correlations. We describe how these indices can be calculated and used to inform: (a) the quality of unit-weighted total and subscale score composites, as well as factor score estimates, and (b) the specification and quality of a measurement model in structural equation modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 150
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [31] STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SETS OF CONGENERIC TESTS
    JORESKOG, KG
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1971, 36 (02) : 109 - &
  • [32] Mind the Gap: A Psychometric Approach to the Reduction Problem
    Kievit, Rogier A.
    Romeijn, Jan-Willem
    Waldorp, Lourens J.
    Wicherts, Jelte M.
    Scholte, H. Steven
    Borsboom, Denny
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2011, 22 (02) : 67 - 87
  • [33] To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits
    Little, TD
    Cunningham, WA
    Shahar, G
    Widaman, KF
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) : 151 - 173
  • [34] Why the Items Versus Parcels Controversy Needn't Be One
    Little, Todd D.
    Rhemtulla, Mijke
    Gibson, Kimberly
    Schoemann, Alexander M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 18 (03) : 285 - 300
  • [35] March J., 1998, Manual for the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children
  • [36] McCrae R. R., 2010, NEO INVENTORIES NEOP
  • [37] McDonald R.P., 1999, TEST THEORY, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410601087/TEST-THEORY-RODERICK-MCDONALD
  • [38] Coefficient Alpha: A Basic Introduction From the Perspectives of Classical Test Theory and Structural Equation Modeling
    Miller, Michael B.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1995, 2 (03) : 255 - 273
  • [39] MEASUREMENT OF FACTORIAL INDETERMINACY
    MULAIK, SA
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1976, 41 (02) : 249 - 262
  • [40] ON STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING WITH DATA THAT ARE NOT MISSING COMPLETELY AT RANDOM
    MUTHEN, B
    KAPLAN, D
    HOLLIS, M
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) : 431 - 462