Quantitative risk assessment of offshore carbon dioxide injection system considering seismic effects

被引:6
作者
Lee, Younggeun [1 ]
Lee, Gunhak [1 ]
An, Jinjoo [2 ]
Kim, Kyeongsu [1 ]
Ahmed, Usama [3 ]
Lee, Chul-Jin [4 ]
Han, Chonghun [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Chem & Biol Engn, Gwanak Ro 1, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[2] KRICT, Carbon Resources Inst, 141 Gajeong Ro, Deajeon 34114, South Korea
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Chem Engn Dept, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[4] Chung Ang Univ, Sch Chem Engn & Mat Sci, 84 Heukseok Ro, Seoul 06980, South Korea
关键词
Quantitative risk analysis; CO2; storage; Seismic effect; Domino effect; Safety management; CO2 STORAGE PROJECT; LEAKAGE; OIL; MANAGEMENT; SAFETY; FAILURE; METHODOLOGY; IMPACTS; CAPTURE; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Quantitative risk analysis (QRA) is one of the most generally used safety analysis measures for risk management in process industries. Currently, earthquakes occur worldwide, resulting in significant damage. Despite the importance of considering the danger of earthquakes, however, seismic effects are often not included in risk analysis owing to difficulties in considering the multi-hazard nature and domino effects of earthquakes. In this study, an improved methodology for QRA was proposed to consider the seismic effects including domino effects, and multi-hazard impacts of an earthquake by using a Bayesian network (BN). This analysis was applied to a topside CO2 injection system for underground storage, which is susceptible to seismic effects. Because frequency analysis is based on a causal relationship, the BN can be used to simultaneously consider domino effects and multi-hazard risks. As a result, the societal risk integral, one of the factors in risk analysis, was 9.667 x 10(-4)/year in modified QRA; this value shows an increase of 3.9% compared with the societal risk integral in conventional QRA. Furthermore, the value can be increased to 35% in the sensitivity analysis depending on annual exceedance probability (AEP). This result shows the importance of considering seismic effects, including both the domino effect and multi-hazard impacts, in QRA. A risk reduction method was additionally applied to mitigate the process risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] *AM I CHEM ENG, 2008, GUID HAZ EV PROC
  • [2] American Institute of Chemical Engineers Center for Chemical Process Safety, 2010, GUID CHEM PROC QUANT
  • [3] An J., 2017, DESIGN OPTIMIZATION
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, SEISM FRAG FORM WAT
  • [5] A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events
    Antonioni, Giacomo
    Spadoni, Gighola
    Cozzani, Valerio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2007, 147 (1-2) : 48 - 59
  • [6] Marine baseline and monitoring strategies for carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS)
    Blackford, Jerry
    Bull, Jonathan M.
    Cevatoglu, Melis
    Connelly, Douglas
    Hauton, Chris
    James, Rachael H.
    Lichtschlag, Anna
    Stahl, Henrik
    Widdicombe, Steve
    Wright, Ian C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 38 : 221 - 229
  • [7] Blackford J, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P1011, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2381, 10.1038/nclimate2381]
  • [8] A review of quantitative risk assessment of onshore pipelines
    da Cunha, Sergio Barros
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 44 : 282 - 298
  • [9] Health, safety and environmental risks of underground CO2 storage -: Overview of mechanisms and current knowledge
    Damen, Kay
    Faaij, Andre
    Turkenburg, Wim
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2006, 74 (1-3) : 289 - 318
  • [10] Quantitative risk analysis of fire and explosion on the top-side LNG-liquefaction process of LNG-FPSO
    Dan, Seungkyu
    Lee, Chang Jun
    Park, Jeongpil
    Shin, Dongil
    Yoon, En Sup
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2014, 92 (05) : 430 - 441